foggy wrote:You can check whether other restore modes work better for you. I would say that we're aware of the issue and currently monitoring the demand for implementing eager zeroed disks restore.
dmitri-va wrote:chjones wrote:Veeam have now opened a case with VMware, as they see the same results internally, and I've given them permission to hand over my details to VMware if they wish to contact me regarding the issue. Fingers crossed.
Just came across the same issue with my Direct SAN restore testing. Is there any update on your case?
SyNtAxx wrote:Maybe i'm off base here, but if you have to test the winds to see if anybody 'wants/demands SAN restores to work as expected i think that is a problem. I resent the fact I have to take a snapshot of a lun I backed up via SAN and mount it to a vm as an RDM in order to restore Gigantic vms via hot add in order to get decent restore speeds. If its not obvious, I vote for SAN restores to work properly.
b.vanhaastrecht wrote:Do we still need to put the presented LUN's online in Windows? As we can't restrore over SAN while LUN's are presented read/write, but are Offline (as desired).
Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 1 guest