Host-based backup of VMware vSphere VMs.
Post Reply
ewatson
Lurker
Posts: 2
Liked: never
Joined: Feb 16, 2022 8:12 pm
Contact:

New Physical Server questions

Post by ewatson »

Hi Everyone,

First, thanks for the incredible information in the other posts I've been looking at. It's been very helpful for me to get up to speed, however, I can't seem to find some more pertinent answers and just looking for a confirmation. So far, installation has been pretty straight forward thanks to Veeam University and the folks here on the forums.

We're moving our VBR to a physical server. Win2016, Intel XEON Gold 5218 (with 40 cores) and 94gb of useable RAM. We currently run 44 backup jobs, involving about 65-70 VMs managed by VMSphere.
Our new server 2 drives in RAID1 for its C: drive at 3.5 TB and another 15 drives in a RAID6 that make up one large volume of 261TB. This large volume is the home of the SOBR.

Questions are as follows:
1. I'm considering ReFS, but unsure if it's worth it...just keep things simple?
2. Should we keep the one large volume, or would it be better to repartition the large volume into smaller volumes of, say, 2x130TB? I was thinking of doing this to help manage the repositories. For example one volume for backup repositories and the second one for SOBR.

I hope this question makes sense, and hasn't been posted before. I've searched and learned a great deal (I'm new to this area), but am still wondering about the above.

Thanks for helping!!
rennerstefan
Veeam Software
Posts: 628
Liked: 146 times
Joined: Jan 22, 2015 2:39 pm
Full Name: Stefan Renner
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: New Physical Server questions

Post by rennerstefan » 1 person likes this post

Hi,

let me try to answer your questions.
1. Yes use ReFS as it will give you benefits like block cloning free of charge. And there is no real downside to it.
2. Make it one large repo as it will allow you to keep it simple (as you said) and also you “only” have 15 disks so I’d try to get the most out of it. Even servers with 56 disks use a single or only two volume across them. So in your Case I’d go with a single one for sure

Hope that helps

Thanks
Stefan Renner

Veeam PMA
Gostev
Chief Product Officer
Posts: 31561
Liked: 6725 times
Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
Location: Baar, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: New Physical Server questions

Post by Gostev » 2 people like this post

Agree.

1. ReFS is worth it IF you want to keep things simple. Simply put, it helps to worry about performance and storage consumption much less in the long run.

2. Considering your relatively small drive size and quantity, a single RAID6 volume is the best choice.
ewatson
Lurker
Posts: 2
Liked: never
Joined: Feb 16, 2022 8:12 pm
Contact:

Re: New Physical Server questions

Post by ewatson »

Thanks folks!!
Yep, that answers my questions. Appreciate you spending the time to help.
matteu
Veeam Legend
Posts: 725
Liked: 118 times
Joined: May 11, 2018 8:42 am
Contact:

Re: New Physical Server questions

Post by matteu » 1 person likes this post

hello,

maybe you could also use this server as linux immutable repisitory and build a vm for veeam and proxy server.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: chriswong17 and 44 guests