-
- Lurker
- Posts: 1
- Liked: never
- Joined: Aug 23, 2021 11:05 pm
- Full Name: Craig Johnson
- Contact:
Physical to Virtual
Are there any drawbacks in just using the backup of a physical machine with the Veeam windows agent and restoring into ESX rather than using the Veeam P2V Converter?
-
- Chief Product Officer
- Posts: 31814
- Liked: 7302 times
- Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Baar, Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: Physical to Virtual
I can't think of any.
-
- VP, Product Management
- Posts: 7081
- Liked: 1511 times
- Joined: May 04, 2011 8:36 am
- Full Name: Andreas Neufert
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
Re: Physical to Virtual
If you speak about the VMware P2V converter, I would go with Veeam, as we create the VM in a way that it is optimized for Backup later. VMware P2V depending on settings will allow you to transfer a phyiscal server into a VM where for example the block allignment is off and performance of this VM (including backup) is not ideal.
-
- Chief Product Officer
- Posts: 31814
- Liked: 7302 times
- Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Baar, Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: Physical to Virtual
Yeah, I would not recommend VMware P2V Converter as we saw some issues associated with it before. But "Veeam P2V Converter" which is instant recovery of any backup to VMware is certainly a good option.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests