I'm trialing B&R v8, and I have a Windows 2012 R2 VM as my B&R server & repository.
I've run backups of the same VMs to a) a standard NTFS volume and b) a deduped NTFS volume. Oddly I'm finding that the dedupe restores (hotadd) run at least as quick as the non-deduped. Actually, faster! Struggling to explain this. Anyone got any ideas?
-
gingerdazza
- Expert
- Posts: 206
- Liked: 14 times
- Joined: Jul 23, 2013 9:14 am
- Full Name: Dazza
- Contact:
-
PTide
- Product Manager
- Posts: 6551
- Liked: 765 times
- Joined: May 19, 2015 1:46 pm
- Contact:
Re: Restore Speeds with Dedupe
Hi,
Thank you.
What was the size difference between two backups?I've run backups of the same VMs to a) a standard NTFS volume and b) a deduped NTFS volume.
Thank you.
-
foggy
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 21138
- Liked: 2141 times
- Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
- Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
- Contact:
Re: Restore Speeds with Dedupe
Also, what are deduplication settings for that volume?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: EricinIT, Paul.Loewenkamp and 71 guests