Discussions specific to the VMware vSphere hypervisor
Buh95
Influencer
Posts: 19
Liked: 3 times
Joined: Nov 17, 2015 1:31 pm
Full Name: H.Schema.
Contact:

Re: VM Restore using nbd, instead of direct SAN

Post by Buh95 » Dec 30, 2015 3:47 pm

Oh... Foggy, are you sure ? Because after long discussion with support about this, nobody seemed aware of this fonctionnality.
And, unless I'm mistaken, there's no reference about this in documentation. Right ?

But I confirm that in my environment, Luns do not turn on write mode before restoration.

foggy
Veeam Software
Posts: 16822
Liked: 1359 times
Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
Contact:

Re: VM Restore using nbd, instead of direct SAN

Post by foggy » Dec 30, 2015 3:53 pm

Yes, Veeam B&R issues a command to switch readonly attribute for the target LUN to false prior actual restore.

Buh95
Influencer
Posts: 19
Liked: 3 times
Joined: Nov 17, 2015 1:31 pm
Full Name: H.Schema.
Contact:

Re: VM Restore using nbd, instead of direct SAN

Post by Buh95 » Dec 31, 2015 7:39 am

Well, I'll contact the support again to clarify this. Thanks for your help.

wgrixti
Influencer
Posts: 11
Liked: never
Joined: Oct 30, 2015 1:02 am
Full Name: Wayne Grixti
Contact:

Re: VM Restore using nbd, instead of direct SAN

Post by wgrixti » Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am

Did you hear anything further on this? I just had the same thing happen to me where my proxy is Direct SAN connected with volumes assigned the Read Only attribute.
When doing the restore it defaulted to NBD instead of SAN.

I am curious to know if what foggy said is true? I am running v9 Update 1.

v.Eremin
Veeam Software
Posts: 15140
Liked: 1141 times
Joined: Oct 26, 2012 3:28 pm
Full Name: Vladimir Eremin
Contact:

Re: VM Restore using nbd, instead of direct SAN

Post by v.Eremin » Jun 09, 2016 6:34 am

Did you hear anything further on this?
This question appears to have been discussed outside of the provided case, so we cannot check it unfortunately.
I am curious to know if what foggy said is true? I am running v9 Update 1.
It is supposed to work the way Alexander's described it, if that doesn't happen, kindly, reach our support team directly.

Thanks.

kroerig
Novice
Posts: 7
Liked: never
Joined: Nov 11, 2014 10:45 am
Full Name: Klaus Rörig
Contact:

Re: VM Restore using nbd, instead of direct SAN

Post by kroerig » Dec 09, 2016 1:24 pm

I do have the same problem. Veeam B&R 9.5 is not using SAN-Mode for restore.
Case ID: 02000544

v.Eremin
Veeam Software
Posts: 15140
Liked: 1141 times
Joined: Oct 26, 2012 3:28 pm
Full Name: Vladimir Eremin
Contact:

Re: VM Restore using nbd, instead of direct SAN

Post by v.Eremin » Dec 09, 2016 5:37 pm

Are you restoring thin disks by any chance?

apronk
Enthusiast
Posts: 66
Liked: 7 times
Joined: Mar 23, 2015 2:47 pm
Full Name: Arend Pronk
Contact:

Re: VM Restore using nbd, instead of direct SAN

Post by apronk » Oct 27, 2017 2:20 pm

I have the same problem as well. Veeam B&R 9.5 is not using SAN-Mode for restore.
Case ID: 02360276

Used Diskpart to clear the read-only flags, but it doesn't help, restore still happens using NBD.
All my VM's are thick provisioned and backup does work over SAN.

foggy
Veeam Software
Posts: 16822
Liked: 1359 times
Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
Contact:

Re: VM Restore using nbd, instead of direct SAN

Post by foggy » Oct 27, 2017 3:50 pm

Hi Arend, have you reviewed the possible limitations of direct SAN restore? If nothing applies, please continue looking into this with your support engineer.

apronk
Enthusiast
Posts: 66
Liked: 7 times
Joined: Mar 23, 2015 2:47 pm
Full Name: Arend Pronk
Contact:

Re: VM Restore using nbd, instead of direct SAN

Post by apronk » Oct 27, 2017 7:05 pm

Hi Alexander,

Unfortunately those limitations do not apply.
It has worked in the past, so it has to do either with Veeam changes or Windows Server 2016 changes (on witch VBR resides).

foggy
Veeam Software
Posts: 16822
Liked: 1359 times
Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
Contact:

Re: VM Restore using nbd, instead of direct SAN

Post by foggy » Oct 29, 2017 9:04 pm

I believe our technical staff will be able to track those changes down. Keep us informed.

apronk
Enthusiast
Posts: 66
Liked: 7 times
Joined: Mar 23, 2015 2:47 pm
Full Name: Arend Pronk
Contact:

Re: VM Restore using nbd, instead of direct SAN

Post by apronk » Oct 30, 2017 8:19 am

So far I have to say they are not very useful, as you can probably see from the Case ID.

foggy
Veeam Software
Posts: 16822
Liked: 1359 times
Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
Contact:

Re: VM Restore using nbd, instead of direct SAN

Post by foggy » Oct 30, 2017 12:22 pm

I can see that investigation is still going on, but you can ask for the case escalation, if you feel deeper analysis required.

apronk
Enthusiast
Posts: 66
Liked: 7 times
Joined: Mar 23, 2015 2:47 pm
Full Name: Arend Pronk
Contact:

Re: VM Restore using nbd, instead of direct SAN

Post by apronk » Oct 30, 2017 1:41 pm 1 person likes this post

Hi Alexander, the case took a good turn and Veeam Support was able to steer me in the right direction.
The problem was in our case duplicated disks, this isn't a problem for backup purposes but for restore purposes it apparently is.
I'm told this would also be solved in Update 3, but I chose to go with MPIO as presented as a solution by Veeam Support.
Configuring MPIO so that the disks are not listed twice anymore solved my restore problem, now VM's are properly restored using SAN transport mode again.

P.S. I never gave MPIO any thought since we switched from iSCSI to FC a couple of years ago...

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests