Hi
I'm just wondering what the differences are between a file/volume level backup and a VM backup in terms of performance / compression?
Would a VM level backup have any better/different compression ratio vs a volume level backup of the same VM?
Similarly, would a VM level backup perform 'better' (faster) vs a volume level backup on the same VM?
Genuinely just curious - I can find documentation that talks about how compression works but nothing that suggests theres any difference in effectiveness between backup types.
Thanks!
-
- Lurker
- Posts: 2
- Liked: never
- Joined: Jul 10, 2020 2:01 pm
- Contact:
-
- Chief Product Officer
- Posts: 31800
- Liked: 7298 times
- Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Baar, Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: Compression - Volume/File vs VM
Hello,
Both VM level and volume-level backups will perform identically in every aspect, because they are both doing exactly the same thing.
File-level backup will always be noticeably slower. Compression ratio will be slightly better if you use our NAS backup functionality, and the same if you use Veeam Backup & Replication or Veeam Agent.
Thanks!
Anton
Both VM level and volume-level backups will perform identically in every aspect, because they are both doing exactly the same thing.
File-level backup will always be noticeably slower. Compression ratio will be slightly better if you use our NAS backup functionality, and the same if you use Veeam Backup & Replication or Veeam Agent.
Thanks!
Anton
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: sivein and 31 guests