Comprehensive data protection for all workloads
Post Reply
jstafford
Novice
Posts: 3
Liked: never
Joined: Aug 20, 2013 8:13 pm
Full Name: JS
Contact:

Remote Site Bandwidth

Post by jstafford »

First, a little bit of background. I have a vCenter server hosted at my Head Office. This managed 2x ESXi host ats ~80 remote branches. Each remote branch backs up (replicates, actually) to local storage at that location.

I'm trying to understand why Veeam is so chatty to my vCenter server:
Image
The netstat command is showing a connection between one of my Veeam boxes and my Central vCenter server.

My question is, why is it using so much bandwidth (My remote branches have a 10MBit pipe, so the Veeam.Backup.Manager.exe process is consuming all of the available bandwidth)? Even more confusing, the traffic is going from my vcenter to my veeam box... Needless to say, this kind of traffic multiplied by ~80 branches is putting enormous load on my not just my central vCenter server, but my whole WAN pipe.

Can anything be done to lessen this bandwidth impact?

Thanks,
--John
Gostev
Chief Product Officer
Posts: 31544
Liked: 6715 times
Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
Location: Baar, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Remote Site Bandwidth

Post by Gostev »

Hi, John. Please open a support case, and our engineers will investigate this for you. Thanks!
jstafford
Novice
Posts: 3
Liked: never
Joined: Aug 20, 2013 8:13 pm
Full Name: JS
Contact:

Re: Remote Site Bandwidth

Post by jstafford »

I have now created a support case.

Thanks,
--John
veremin
Product Manager
Posts: 20284
Liked: 2258 times
Joined: Oct 26, 2012 3:28 pm
Full Name: Vladimir Eremin
Contact:

Re: Remote Site Bandwidth

Post by veremin »

Can you please post the ticket number here for the convenience of future readers experiencing similar problems? Thanks.
jstafford
Novice
Posts: 3
Liked: never
Joined: Aug 20, 2013 8:13 pm
Full Name: JS
Contact:

Re: Remote Site Bandwidth

Post by jstafford »

Case # 00615686
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], broonster, ekulaga, Google [Bot] and 94 guests