Discussions related to exporting backups to tape and backing up directly to tape.
Post Reply
mma
Service Provider
Posts: 111
Liked: 21 times
Joined: Dec 22, 2011 9:12 am
Full Name: Marcel
Location: Lucerne, Switzerland
Contact:

Endpoint Backup to Tape (GFS)

Post by mma »

Hello

I have a problem with a GFS backup to tape job. The sources for the job are one VMware Backup and two Endpoint Backups. The job is set to create a weekly backup on Sundays and a monthly backup on every first Sunday of a month. The backup runs perfect, except for the first weekly after the monthly backup. It always creates a monthly and a weekly copy of the endpoint backups. The monthly backup the week before was successful btw.

Any ideas?

Job log:

Code: Select all

09.10.2016 00:00:44 :: Building source backup files list started at 09.10.2016 00:00 
09.10.2016 00:00:45 :: No GFS candidate for Weekly media set was found for today, waiting 
09.10.2016 00:00:45 :: Source backup files detected. VBK: 0, VBK map: 0, VIB: 0 
09.10.2016 21:26:32 :: Full backup from Backup_Job_customerSRV172016-10-09T210010.vib (09.10.2016 00:00:00) restore point will be placed to weekly media set 
09.10.2016 21:26:32 :: Source backup files detected. VBK: 0, VBK map: 1, VIB: 0 
09.10.2016 21:26:32 :: Creating full backup map for \\192.168.100.126\VeeamBackup\customer_sa-veeam\Backup_Job_customerSRV17\Backup_Job_customerSRV172016-10-09T210010.vib 
09.10.2016 21:26:50 :: Failed to detect backup files to copy to tape from (sa-veeam)Backup Job customerSRV17 backup job 
09.10.2016 21:36:52 :: Only last virtual full creation required according to job settings. Skipping date 25.09.2016 
09.10.2016 21:36:53 :: Only last virtual full creation required according to job settings. Skipping date 02.10.2016 
[b]09.10.2016 21:36:53 :: Full backup was placed to the Weekly media set . Backing up to the monthly media set due longer overwrite protection period. Processing full backup \\192.168.100.126\VeeamBackup\customer_sa-veeam\Backup_Job_customerSRV17\Backup_Job_customerSRV172016-10-02T210010.vbk[/b] 
09.10.2016 21:36:53 :: Source backup files detected. VBK: 1, VBK map: 1, VIB: 0 
09.10.2016 21:36:53 :: Creating full backup map for \\192.168.100.126\VeeamBackup\customer_sa-veeam\Backup_Job_customerSRV17\Backup_Job_customerSRV172016-10-09T210010.vib 
09.10.2016 21:39:47 :: Queued for processing at 09.10.2016 21:39:47 
09.10.2016 21:39:47 :: Backup to media set monthly started at 10/09/2016 00:00:12 
09.10.2016 21:39:48 :: Drive 1 (Server: customerSRV17, Library: HP 1x8 G2 AUTOLDR 4.50, Drive ID: Tape0) locked successfully 
09.10.2016 21:39:48 :: Loading tape EJY699L5 from Slot 1 to Drive 1 (Server: customerSRV17, Library: HP 1x8 G2 AUTOLDR 4.50, Drive ID: Tape0) 
09.10.2016 21:41:14 :: Current tape is EJY699L5 
09.10.2016 21:41:29 :: New tape backup session started, encryption: disabled 
09.10.2016 21:43:03 :: Processing Backup_Job_customerSRV172016-10-09T210010.vbk 
09.10.2016 23:39:57 :: 0 directories and 1 files backed up 
09.10.2016 23:39:57 :: Busy: Source 0% > Proxy 6% > Network 0% > Target 35% 
09.10.2016 23:39:57 :: Primary bottleneck: Target 
09.10.2016 23:39:57 :: Network traffic verification detected no corrupted blocks 
09.10.2016 23:39:57 :: Processing finished with errors at 09.10.2016 23:39:57 
[b]09.10.2016 23:41:37 :: Backup to media set weekly started at 10/09/2016 00:00:12[/b] 
09.10.2016 23:41:37 :: Drive 1 (Server: customerSRV17, Library: HP 1x8 G2 AUTOLDR 4.50, Drive ID: Tape0) locked successfully 
09.10.2016 23:41:37 :: Loading tape EJY702L5 from Slot 2 to Drive 1 (Server: customerSRV17, Library: HP 1x8 G2 AUTOLDR 4.50, Drive ID: Tape0) 
09.10.2016 23:43:01 :: Current tape is EJY702L5 
10.10.2016 04:09:58 :: 0 directories and 2 files backed up 
10.10.2016 04:09:58 :: Busy: Source 0% > Proxy 5% > Network 0% > Target 23% 
10.10.2016 04:09:58 :: Primary bottleneck: Target 
10.10.2016 04:09:58 :: Network traffic verification detected no corrupted blocks 
10.10.2016 04:09:58 :: Processing finished with errors at 10.10.2016 04:09:58
Regards
Marcel
veremin
Product Manager
Posts: 20415
Liked: 2302 times
Joined: Oct 26, 2012 3:28 pm
Full Name: Vladimir Eremin
Contact:

Re: Endpoint Backup to Tape (GFS)

Post by veremin »

Not sure what particular issue you're talking about. Based on the provided information, it seems that every first Sunday of the month, GFS backup to tape job synthesizes a monthly restore point, skipping a weekly one. That's expected behaviour, if both weekly and monthly GFS restore points are scheduled to the same day, priority is given to monthly one. Thanks.
mma
Service Provider
Posts: 111
Liked: 21 times
Joined: Dec 22, 2011 9:12 am
Full Name: Marcel
Location: Lucerne, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Endpoint Backup to Tape (GFS)

Post by mma »

09.10.2016 was the second Sunday of October. There was already a monthly backup of the endpoints on 02.10.2016.
veremin
Product Manager
Posts: 20415
Liked: 2302 times
Joined: Oct 26, 2012 3:28 pm
Full Name: Vladimir Eremin
Contact:

Re: Endpoint Backup to Tape (GFS)

Post by veremin »

Was not backup that had been originally archived on 2.10 removed from tapes by any chance? Thanks.
mma
Service Provider
Posts: 111
Liked: 21 times
Joined: Dec 22, 2011 9:12 am
Full Name: Marcel
Location: Lucerne, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Endpoint Backup to Tape (GFS)

Post by mma »

No, the Backup from 02.10.2016 is still on the monthly tape.

I have:

2 Tapes Monthly Media Set 02.10.2016 (1 x VM Backup Job, 2 Endpoint Backups)
2 Tapes Weekly Media Set 09.10.2016 (1 x VM Backup Job, 2 Endpoint Backups)
1 Tape Monthly Media Set 09.10.2016 (2 Endpoints Backups, same Backup as the one from 02.10.2016)
veremin
Product Manager
Posts: 20415
Liked: 2302 times
Joined: Oct 26, 2012 3:28 pm
Full Name: Vladimir Eremin
Contact:

Re: Endpoint Backup to Tape (GFS)

Post by veremin »

Then, please, open a case with our support team and let them investigate it directly. Thanks.
mma
Service Provider
Posts: 111
Liked: 21 times
Joined: Dec 22, 2011 9:12 am
Full Name: Marcel
Location: Lucerne, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Endpoint Backup to Tape (GFS)

Post by mma »

Case 01930113
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests