Host-based backup of Microsoft Hyper-V VMs.
Post Reply
TGacs
Enthusiast
Posts: 37
Liked: 8 times
Joined: Sep 27, 2016 6:59 pm
Contact:

Resource not ready: Hyper-V backup proxy

Post by TGacs »

9.5U2
In my configuration, I have one Hyper-V proxy defined (the backup server) which is set for a max of 20 concurrent tasks (and it has a green checkmark next to the "20" indicating there are sufficient server resources).

There are 2 health check jobs running, and a third backup is "Waiting for backup infrastructure resources availability" with detail information of "Resource not ready: Hyper-V backup proxy" on the first pending VM.

With the proxy able to support 20 concurrent tasks, why is the backup job waiting?
Shestakov
Veteran
Posts: 7328
Liked: 781 times
Joined: May 21, 2014 11:03 am
Full Name: Nikita Shestakov
Location: Prague
Contact:

Re: Resource not ready: Hyper-V backup proxy

Post by Shestakov »

Hello, I would recommend to contact Veeam support. Once you do, please post your support case number here. Thanks!
veremin
Product Manager
Posts: 20415
Liked: 2302 times
Joined: Oct 26, 2012 3:28 pm
Full Name: Vladimir Eremin
Contact:

Re: Resource not ready: Hyper-V backup proxy

Post by veremin »

Just out of curiosity - how many virtual disks those VMs have (the ones for which health check is currently running)? Are there any task limits set on repository server? Thanks.
TGacs
Enthusiast
Posts: 37
Liked: 8 times
Joined: Sep 27, 2016 6:59 pm
Contact:

Re: Resource not ready: Hyper-V backup proxy

Post by TGacs »

Sorry for the delay in responding.

The jobs on which the health checks were occurring may have cumulatively had more than 20 virtual disks. So if each virtual disk is considered a 'task' as far as the proxy is concerned, then may be that would explain it?
Shestakov
Veteran
Posts: 7328
Liked: 781 times
Joined: May 21, 2014 11:03 am
Full Name: Nikita Shestakov
Location: Prague
Contact:

Re: Resource not ready: Hyper-V backup proxy

Post by Shestakov » 1 person likes this post

One task = one virtual disk. So yes, that may be the reason.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 11 guests