Comprehensive data protection for all workloads
Post Reply
rasmusan
Enthusiast
Posts: 50
Liked: never
Joined: Jan 20, 2015 9:03 pm
Full Name: Rasmus Andersen
Contact:

Instant VM Recovery maximums

Post by rasmusan »

Hello

I am struggeling to find any sizing recommendations as to how many simulatenous Instant VM Recovery jobs you can run?

For this particular case it will be Hyper-V server 2016... but I guess the same recommendations would apply to VMware as well??
Gostev
Chief Product Officer
Posts: 31533
Liked: 6703 times
Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
Location: Baar, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Instant VM Recovery maximums

Post by Gostev »

I blogged about this a while ago after some customer tested this and shared numbers... don't remember the exact details by now, but it was on VMware and over a couple of hundreds VMs. Of course, not something you'd want to do in real life due to backup repository IOPS constraints, but it will work reliably. And if you have multiple separate repositories, then you can scale it horizontally.
Gostev
Chief Product Officer
Posts: 31533
Liked: 6703 times
Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
Location: Baar, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Instant VM Recovery maximums

Post by Gostev »

Here, found it:
Here is an absolutely fascinating number from a POC with one of our prospects. They've been testing Instant VM Recovery scalability, and ended up running 281 VMs from the backup! Now, of course those instant restores were PowerShell scripted, otherwise there would be too much clicking involved... and I assume the instantly recovered VMs were light on the load too – because VM startup was taking less than 1 minute per VM up until the end. Still, this is an extremely impressive result – I don't believe we pushed IR engine this far internally, primarily because achieving anything like this has two critical dependencies. First, their backup storage is a beast designed according to my earlier recommendations (big fat Cisco S3260 with a few SSDs dedicated to vPower NFS cache). Second, getting there absolutely requires version 9.5, where our developers have put an incredible amount of effort optimizing and accelerating vPower NFS to improve its scalability by an order of magnitude. And I do know they did not have enough time to include some final touches – so there's even more improvement to look forward to in the future!
rasmusan
Enthusiast
Posts: 50
Liked: never
Joined: Jan 20, 2015 9:03 pm
Full Name: Rasmus Andersen
Contact:

Re: Instant VM Recovery maximums

Post by rasmusan »

Hi Gostev

Thanks for info.

However for Hyper-V, I understand Instant VM Recovery is a different than with VMware... My thoughts have been exactly on the Cisco S3260 server with a lot of NL-SAS disks, but does the sizing with SSD's for vPower NFS cache still apply in Hyper-V scenario?
jazzoberoi
Enthusiast
Posts: 96
Liked: 23 times
Joined: Oct 08, 2014 9:07 am
Full Name: Jazz Oberoi
Contact:

Re: Instant VM Recovery maximums

Post by jazzoberoi »

rasmusan wrote:Hi Gostev

Thanks for info.

However for Hyper-V, I understand Instant VM Recovery is a different than with VMware... My thoughts have been exactly on the Cisco S3260 server with a lot of NL-SAS disks, but does the sizing with SSD's for vPower NFS cache still apply in Hyper-V scenario?
Does it ? :)
Mike Resseler
Product Manager
Posts: 8045
Liked: 1263 times
Joined: Feb 08, 2013 3:08 pm
Full Name: Mike Resseler
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Re: Instant VM Recovery maximums

Post by Mike Resseler »

No, it doesn't. Hyper-V indeed works differently. When you start instant VM recovery, a dummy VM with empty disks on the target host (which you select in the wizard) is created. VBR creates a protective snapshot for the dummy VM and then the VM is started. (This is necessary to make sure there is no data loss). Then we start a pair of data movers on the backup repository and on the target host to mount the VM disks from the backup file to the dummy VM.

However, with this type of recovery, IOPS remain an important part. As you can read above, there is some IO being performed :-).
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ncapponi, Semrush [Bot] and 124 guests