Host-based backup of VMware vSphere VMs.
Post Reply
JuA
Enthusiast
Posts: 54
Liked: 6 times
Joined: Jan 20, 2015 1:25 pm
Full Name: Julien A
Contact:

Veeam 9.5 - "Direct SAN" mode limited at 8gbps

Post by JuA »

Hi,

Environment:
  • * Veeam 6.5
    * VMware 6.5
    * Netapp AFF300 via Fibre Channel
    * Physical Proxy vith Fibre Channel HBA
    * All Fibre Channel gear @16gbps.
    * No Backup I/O Control.

I am deploying a physical proxy , with internal disks as primary backup storage. Everything is connected fine to perform backups from SAN storage snapshots. Everything in the SAN is at 16gbps.

I see that my job is performing (reading) at ~950MBps = 76800mbps ~= 8gpbs.
In the same time, the proxy is writing on the internal disks at ~370MBps. I don't see contention on the local disks.

Veeam says that the primary bottleneck is the source (Source 99% > Proxy 21% > Network 52% > Target 3%).

I can't find the origin of the limit.

I tried to put a very high bandwidth limit at the Proxy level, but the GUI accepts a maximum of 1024 MBps...

Does the proxy limit the trafic speed at 1024 MBps ? if yes, is it possible to change this limit ?

Any idea is welcome.
ctg49
Enthusiast
Posts: 65
Liked: 45 times
Joined: Feb 14, 2018 1:47 pm
Full Name: Chris Garlington
Contact:

Re: Veeam 6.5 - "Direct SAN" mode limited at 8gbps

Post by ctg49 »

What's your disk type? If it's not flash, you're probably limited by the SAN disk speed. If it is flash, i'd be a little more curious as you should be saturating a 16gbps connection unless there's something wonky going on internally (controller flooded? SAN CPU capped out?)
JuA
Enthusiast
Posts: 54
Liked: 6 times
Joined: Jan 20, 2015 1:25 pm
Full Name: Julien A
Contact:

Re: Veeam 6.5 - "Direct SAN" mode limited at 8gbps

Post by JuA »

All the Netapp array from the "AFF series" are full flash.
Andreas Neufert
VP, Product Management
Posts: 6707
Liked: 1401 times
Joined: May 04, 2011 8:36 am
Full Name: Andreas Neufert
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: Veeam 6.5 - "Direct SAN" mode limited at 8gbps

Post by Andreas Neufert »

It is hard to say, but maybe you can create a seperate LUN and mount it to the Veeam Server and use a disk performance tool (1MB block sizes random read) to check if you get faster backups.
So that you have a reference point to see if it is Veeam or the actual configuration.

Maybe a more simple task would be to copy files arround and look at the speed there (multiple in parallel).
Andreas Neufert
VP, Product Management
Posts: 6707
Liked: 1401 times
Joined: May 04, 2011 8:36 am
Full Name: Andreas Neufert
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: Veeam 6.5 - "Direct SAN" mode limited at 8gbps

Post by Andreas Neufert »

And please check if you use Veeam 9.5 Update 3a (6.5 is very old).
JuA
Enthusiast
Posts: 54
Liked: 6 times
Joined: Jan 20, 2015 1:25 pm
Full Name: Julien A
Contact:

Re: Veeam 6.5 - "Direct SAN" mode limited at 8gbps

Post by JuA »

It's 9.5 last update, of course! :)

I wrote the title of my message from a copy/past when I searched the forum before asking... and I I didn't change the version.

Can you change the title and my original post ? If no, I will close the post and open a new one.
Andreas Neufert
VP, Product Management
Posts: 6707
Liked: 1401 times
Joined: May 04, 2011 8:36 am
Full Name: Andreas Neufert
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: Veeam 9.5 - "Direct SAN" mode limited at 8gbps

Post by Andreas Neufert »

Done, as well please tell us how many disks you backup in parallel. The maximum speed can be reached only with multiple (arround 20 disks) parallel backups.
As well please check with Active Full processing speed first.
JuA
Enthusiast
Posts: 54
Liked: 6 times
Joined: Jan 20, 2015 1:25 pm
Full Name: Julien A
Contact:

Re: Veeam 9.5 - "Direct SAN" mode limited at 8gbps

Post by JuA »

For this fist test, we have only 1 VM in the job, and nothing else is running.

It has 4 disks, but 3 of them are quite small, so after some seconds, there is only one disk processed.
JuA
Enthusiast
Posts: 54
Liked: 6 times
Joined: Jan 20, 2015 1:25 pm
Full Name: Julien A
Contact:

Re: Veeam 9.5 - "Direct SAN" mode limited at 8gbps

Post by JuA »

New test: I put a second VM in my job, so now I have 2 disks being read in parallel. 1,5GBps.
nitramd
Veteran
Posts: 297
Liked: 85 times
Joined: Feb 16, 2017 8:05 pm
Contact:

Re: Veeam 9.5 - "Direct SAN" mode limited at 8gbps

Post by nitramd »

Have you considered adding vCenter to your test job? It usually has 10-12 disks.
skrause
Veteran
Posts: 487
Liked: 105 times
Joined: Dec 08, 2014 2:58 pm
Full Name: Steve Krause
Contact:

Re: Veeam 9.5 - "Direct SAN" mode limited at 8gbps

Post by skrause »

Are you sure all of your FC SFPs are actually 16gb and not 8gb?
Steve Krause
Veeam Certified Architect
Andreas Neufert
VP, Product Management
Posts: 6707
Liked: 1401 times
Joined: May 04, 2011 8:36 am
Full Name: Andreas Neufert
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: Veeam 9.5 - "Direct SAN" mode limited at 8gbps

Post by Andreas Neufert »

A single VM disk read stream is usually limited by the storages and they perform much better with multiple disk backups in parallel.
As well if you have only one disk that is just some 100GB, you will not reach full speed as it is over before it has started to transport data.

My recommendation is to backup at least 20 VM disks in parallel to reach full speed of the backup and storage solutions.
Btw. same apply if you work with a single VM vs. 20 VMs in parallel on primary side and transport data there.
JuA
Enthusiast
Posts: 54
Liked: 6 times
Joined: Jan 20, 2015 1:25 pm
Full Name: Julien A
Contact:

Re: Veeam 9.5 - "Direct SAN" mode limited at 8gbps

Post by JuA » 2 people like this post

While backuping 4 VM with a total of 6 disks in parallel, I was able to see the Proxy read at 2GBps = 16gbps, the nominal speed of my FC links.

So... Everything is ok.
Andreas Neufert
VP, Product Management
Posts: 6707
Liked: 1401 times
Joined: May 04, 2011 8:36 am
Full Name: Andreas Neufert
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: Veeam 9.5 - "Direct SAN" mode limited at 8gbps

Post by Andreas Neufert »

Thanks for following up and sharing this.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 110 guests