-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 65
- Liked: 4 times
- Joined: Oct 06, 2016 1:19 pm
- Contact:
Forcing guest interaction proxy
I'm trying to get a GIP to be selected, but the job fails back to the backup server. The VM guest to back up is in a different subnet.
Here are the adresses:
Backup Server (BS): 10.1.12.20
GIP: 10.1.20.11
Guest: 10.1.19.55
There are many other guest VMs, but I'm using one here to represent them.
The BS is blocked by firewall and may not contact the guest dirctly. It has openings to reach the GIP.
I put the GIP as the only one to be used in the job, but the logs show this is not chosen. GIP is listed first, with "level=DifferentSubnetworkProxy" and the BS with "level=DifferentSubnetworkBackupConsole : failover only". Yet, the BS is chosen and the job fails.
Opening the firewall between BS and Guest is not an option. The GIP has been deployed to handle the OS interaction.
How can I get the job to use the GIP, and fail if it does not work?
EDIT: Using VIX is not an option, as the VMs are secured with UAC and Administrator account is disabled.
Here are the adresses:
Backup Server (BS): 10.1.12.20
GIP: 10.1.20.11
Guest: 10.1.19.55
There are many other guest VMs, but I'm using one here to represent them.
The BS is blocked by firewall and may not contact the guest dirctly. It has openings to reach the GIP.
I put the GIP as the only one to be used in the job, but the logs show this is not chosen. GIP is listed first, with "level=DifferentSubnetworkProxy" and the BS with "level=DifferentSubnetworkBackupConsole : failover only". Yet, the BS is chosen and the job fails.
Opening the firewall between BS and Guest is not an option. The GIP has been deployed to handle the OS interaction.
How can I get the job to use the GIP, and fail if it does not work?
EDIT: Using VIX is not an option, as the VMs are secured with UAC and Administrator account is disabled.
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 3077
- Liked: 453 times
- Joined: Aug 07, 2018 3:11 pm
- Full Name: Fedor Maslov
- Contact:
Re: Forcing guest interaction proxy
Hi Signal,
Please let us know the following:
What guest OS your target VM runs?
Have you configured GIP to be used in the Job settings?
Is the target guest OS accessible by LAN from the GIP machine?
The limitations of GIP are listed here.
Thanks in advance!
Please let us know the following:
What guest OS your target VM runs?
Have you configured GIP to be used in the Job settings?
Is the target guest OS accessible by LAN from the GIP machine?
The limitations of GIP are listed here.
Thanks in advance!
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 65
- Liked: 4 times
- Joined: Oct 06, 2016 1:19 pm
- Contact:
Re: Forcing guest interaction proxy
Hi wishr
Thanks for your reply.
In automatic it just selects one of the registered Windows systems "at random", and when trying to force the GIP the BS is used.
As I stated in my original post:
The GIP and Guest are in a different AD Domain to BS, proxies, storage, etc. I don't think it should be relevant as VBR seems to not care about that.
Thanks for your reply.
Both the BS, GIP and Guest all run Windows Server 2012 R2What guest OS your target VM runs?
I've attempted both automatic selection and trying to force the GIP by selecting only that VM in the list of proxies.Have you configured GIP to be used in the Job settings?
In automatic it just selects one of the registered Windows systems "at random", and when trying to force the GIP the BS is used.
As I stated in my original post:
signal wrote: ↑Dec 12, 2018 11:43 am I put the GIP as the only one to be used in the job, but the logs show this is not chosen. GIP is listed first, with "level=DifferentSubnetworkProxy" and the BS with "level=DifferentSubnetworkBackupConsole : failover only". Yet, the BS is chosen and the job fails.
Yes, there are no firewall rules between the GIP and Guest. Seen from VBR perspective they are in different subnets.Is the target guest OS accessible by LAN from the GIP machine?
The GIP and Guest are in a different AD Domain to BS, proxies, storage, etc. I don't think it should be relevant as VBR seems to not care about that.
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 3077
- Liked: 453 times
- Joined: Aug 07, 2018 3:11 pm
- Full Name: Fedor Maslov
- Contact:
Re: Forcing guest interaction proxy
Hi Signal,
Thank you for the answers.
GIP operates via RPC or VIX, in case of RPC usage you should supply an account with Local Administrator privileges in the Guest OS. Could you please confirm (saw your comment in the initial post) that your account has the required privileges because if GIP is unable to connect the failback to the B&R server will be initiated and this will look similar to the symptoms you are experiencing. Since you B&R server is located in the different subnet it will fail to connect to the vC as well and the job will fail in the final.
Some additional information related to GIP is here.
Thanks
Thank you for the answers.
GIP operates via RPC or VIX, in case of RPC usage you should supply an account with Local Administrator privileges in the Guest OS. Could you please confirm (saw your comment in the initial post) that your account has the required privileges because if GIP is unable to connect the failback to the B&R server will be initiated and this will look similar to the symptoms you are experiencing. Since you B&R server is located in the different subnet it will fail to connect to the vC as well and the job will fail in the final.
Some additional information related to GIP is here.
Thanks
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 65
- Liked: 4 times
- Joined: Oct 06, 2016 1:19 pm
- Contact:
Re: Forcing guest interaction proxy
The service account used is local administrator on the GIP and on the Guest system.Could you please confirm (saw your comment in the initial post) that your account has the required privileges because if GIP is unable to connect the failback to the B&R server will be initiated and this will look similar to the symptoms you are experiencing.
From what I see in the log (mentioned in first post), "[Log folder]\<Job name>\Job.<Job name>.Backup.log" there is an "election process" to choose the GIP to use.
Code: Select all
Info Task group <id> is ready. Preparing next task group for processing
Info - - Request: VssProxy, proxies [Guest interaction proxy resource [id=<GIP id> . srv name=<GIP fqdn> : access level=DifferentSubnetworkProxy]],[Guest interaction proxy resource [id=<BS id> . srv name=<BS fqdn> : access level=DifferentSubnetworkBackupConsole : failover only]]
Info - - - Response: Guest interaction proxy resource [id=<BS id> . srv name=<BS fqdn> : access level=DifferentSubnetworkBackupConsole : failover only]
Info Staring guest agent
Note: This is a closed system with no posibility to copy out the logs. I've just typed in the log entries as I see them.
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 3077
- Liked: 453 times
- Joined: Aug 07, 2018 3:11 pm
- Full Name: Fedor Maslov
- Contact:
Re: Forcing guest interaction proxy
Could you please let us know what do you see in the B&R session screen? We will appreciate if you could post a screenshot or something representing all the actions happened during the session.
Unfortunately, this small piece of the log does not tell us anything interesting and there is no indication of any "election". After the lines you've typed in should be some events indicating that the GIP connection has been established, and right after them you probably have some kind of errors. The same can be noticed in the session UI in right in B&R.
Unfortunately, this small piece of the log does not tell us anything interesting and there is no indication of any "election". After the lines you've typed in should be some events indicating that the GIP connection has been established, and right after them you probably have some kind of errors. The same can be noticed in the session UI in right in B&R.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 65
- Liked: 4 times
- Joined: Oct 06, 2016 1:19 pm
- Contact:
Re: Forcing guest interaction proxy
As this is a closed system I have no way of getting a screenshot out.Could you please let us know what do you see in the B&R session screen? We will appreciate if you could post a screenshot or something representing all the actions happened during the session.
The GUI out for the job is:
Code: Select all
[list]
[*][color=green]Job started at 13.12.2018 11:48:29[/color]
[*][color=green]Building VMs list[/color]
[*][color=green]VM size: 480,0 GB (128,3 GB used)[/color]
[*][color=green]Changed block tracking is enabled[/color]
[*][color=green]Queued for processing at 13.12.2018 11:48:57[/color]
[*][color=green]Required backup infrastructure resources have been assigned[/color]
[*][color=green]Creating storage snapshot[/color]
[*][color=red]Processing <Guest1> Error: Failed to prepare VM for processing: Failed to connect to guest agent. Errors:
'Cannot connect to the host's administrative share. Host: [<FQDN of Guest1>]. Account: [<GuestDomain>\<Service account>].
Win32 error. The network path was not found.
Code: 53
Cannot connect to the host's administrative share. Host: [<IP of Guest1>]. Account: [<GuestDomain>\<Service account>].
Win32 error. The network path was not found.
Code: 53
'[/color]
[*][color=red]Processing <Guest2> Error: Failed to prepare VM for processing: Failed to connect to guest agent. Errors:
'Cannot connect to the host's administrative share. Host: [<FQDN of Guest2>]. Account: [<GuestDomain>\<Service account>].
Win32 error. The network path was not found.
Code: 53
Cannot connect to the host's administrative share. Host: [<IP of Guest2>]. Account: [<GuestDomain>\<Service account>].
Win32 error. The network path was not found.
Code: 53
'[/color]
[*][color=green]All VMs have been queued for processing[/color]
[*][color=green]Deleting storage snapshot[/color]
[*][color=red]Job finished with errors at 13.12.2018 11:50:04[/color]
[/list]
Code: Select all
[list]
[*][color=green]VMware Tools are not up to date, some fuctionality may be affected[/color]
[*][color=green]Using guest interaction proxy <BS FQDN> (Different subnet)[/color]
[*][color=green]Failed to inventory guest system: Veeam Guest Agent is not started[/color]
[*][color=red]Failed to prepare guest for hot backup. Error: Failed to connect to guest agent. Errors: 'Cannot connect to the host's administrative share. Host: [<Guest1 FQDN>]. Account: [<GuestDomain>\<Service account>]. Win32 error: The network path was not found. Code: 53 Cannot connect to the host's administrative share. Host: [<Guest1 IP>]. Account: [<GuestDomain>\<Service account>]. Win32 error: The network path was not found. Code: 53'[/color]
[*][color=green]Queued for processing at 13.12.2018 11:49:48[/color]
[*][color=green]Required backup infrastructure resources have been assigned[/color]
[*][color=green]VM processing started at 13.12.2018 11:49:53[/color]
[*][color=green]VM size: 100,0 GB (18,8 GB used)[/color]
[*][color=red]Error: Failed to prepare VM for processing: Failed to connect to guest agent. Errors: 'Cannot connect to the host's administrative share. Host: [<Guest1 FQDN>]. Account: [<GuestDomain>\<Service account>]. Win32 error: The network path was not found. Code: 53 Cannot connect to the host's administrative share. Host: [<Guest1 IP>]. Account: [<GuestDomain>\<Service account>]. Win32 error: The network path was not found. Code: 53'[/color]
[*][color=green]Network traffic verification detected no corrupted blocks[/color]
[*][color=red]Processing finished with errors at 13.12.2018 11:49:56[/color]
[/list]
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 3077
- Liked: 453 times
- Joined: Aug 07, 2018 3:11 pm
- Full Name: Fedor Maslov
- Contact:
Re: Forcing guest interaction proxy
Thank you for the efforts!
Unfortunately, this information makes the situation even more complicated. I would recommend you to request a Webex session with our support engineers since we should have a look at all the info on our own, especially at the log files to not assume or recommend anything improperly due to lack of details.
Please do not forget to post your case ID here once you have it.
Thanks
Unfortunately, this information makes the situation even more complicated. I would recommend you to request a Webex session with our support engineers since we should have a look at all the info on our own, especially at the log files to not assume or recommend anything improperly due to lack of details.
Please do not forget to post your case ID here once you have it.
Thanks
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 65
- Liked: 4 times
- Joined: Oct 06, 2016 1:19 pm
- Contact:
Re: Forcing guest interaction proxy
Again, this is a closed system, and a webex is impossible.
I've typed out a little more from the log file:
Right after this comes the GIP selection process I put in earlier:
So, the BS is selected over the specified GIP. My question is why? And, is there a way to either get the GIP selected first, or the BS excluded?
I've typed out a little more from the log file:
Code: Select all
Info [VssProxyHelper] VSS Proxy is needed: VSS is enabled
Info Testing vss proxy ip [10.1.20.11], netmask [255.255.255.0]
Info Testing vm ip [10.1.19.55]
Info Vss proxy host <GIP fqdn> and Vm are not in the same subnetwork
Info Testing vss proxy ip [10.1.12.20], netmask [255.255.255.0]
Info Testing vm ip [10.1.19.55]
Info Vss proxy host <BS fqdn> and Vm are not in the same subnetwork
Code: Select all
Info Task group <id> is ready. Preparing next task group for processing
Info - - Request: VssProxy, proxies [Guest interaction proxy resource [id=<GIP id> . srv name=<GIP fqdn> : access level=DifferentSubnetworkProxy]],[Guest interaction proxy resource [id=<BS id> . srv name=<BS fqdn> : access level=DifferentSubnetworkBackupConsole : failover only]]
Info - - - Response: Guest interaction proxy resource [id=<BS id> . srv name=<BS fqdn> : access level=DifferentSubnetworkBackupConsole : failover only]
Info Starting guest agent
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 3077
- Liked: 453 times
- Joined: Aug 07, 2018 3:11 pm
- Full Name: Fedor Maslov
- Contact:
Re: Forcing guest interaction proxy
Hi Signal,
In the above lines, there is no indication which component is selected, but your UI session states that B&R server is selected for processing the Guest OS interaction (probably because of the failback to B&R server due to some GIP processing failure).
There should be some lines with exact error messages (5-20 following lines) after the "Info Starting guest agent" line indicating what's going wrong with GIP tying to put the file into the share. I recommend you to collect as much information as possible from the log files and open a case with our support engineers since logs analysis is performed on the support team end and it's definitely required in this case.
We will appreciate if you can post the above lines of code as well as the case ID, so we can keep a track of the situation from the product management perspective.
Thanks
In the above lines, there is no indication which component is selected, but your UI session states that B&R server is selected for processing the Guest OS interaction (probably because of the failback to B&R server due to some GIP processing failure).
There should be some lines with exact error messages (5-20 following lines) after the "Info Starting guest agent" line indicating what's going wrong with GIP tying to put the file into the share. I recommend you to collect as much information as possible from the log files and open a case with our support engineers since logs analysis is performed on the support team end and it's definitely required in this case.
We will appreciate if you can post the above lines of code as well as the case ID, so we can keep a track of the situation from the product management perspective.
Thanks
-
- Service Provider
- Posts: 83
- Liked: 13 times
- Joined: Nov 11, 2015 3:50 pm
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
Re: Forcing guest interaction proxy
I just came across this exact issue, where the GIP, while the only one selected, does always failover to the VBR server itself, even if the GIP has proper network access to the SQL server I want to backup.
@Signal, how did you end up resolving yours?
@Signal, how did you end up resolving yours?
VMCE
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 21070
- Liked: 2115 times
- Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
- Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
- Contact:
Re: Forcing guest interaction proxy
Since this is a pretty old thread, I recommend contacting support directly for assistance - they will be able to review logs to identify the actual reason of guest interaction proxy failing over to the backup server.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 83 guests