Comprehensive data protection for all workloads
Post Reply
ND40oz
Influencer
Posts: 19
Liked: 1 time
Joined: Nov 17, 2010 12:52 am
Full Name: ND40oz
Contact:

SOBR extent placement policies

Post by ND40oz »

I finally started messing around with the Scale-out Repositories after a meeting with our rep who suggested we check it out and I'm a little unsure of how to configure things.

Is there anyway to have a local capacity tier instead of having to use object storage for it? I currently have two REFS volumes allocated to it, one is an array of SSDs and the other is an array of SAS HDDs and I'd like to backup everything to the SSDs and then use the HDDs as capacity to age them over to.

Since I haven't been able to setup a capacity tier, currently I have them both in the Performance tier and there doesn't appear to be a way to tell it to use the SSD volume for everything first and then start using the HDD volume once it becomes full. For the Placement Policy even when you choose Performance your only options are Full backup and/or Incremental for each of the extents. Is Veeam B&R expecting that all the extents in a Scale-out Repository are backed by disk with like performance instead of allowing the tiering of higher performing disks?

TIA
jmmarton
Veeam Software
Posts: 2092
Liked: 309 times
Joined: Nov 17, 2015 2:38 am
Full Name: Joe Marton
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:

Re: SOBR extent placement policies

Post by jmmarton »

You would need to expose the HDD volumes as S3, then use that for Capacity Tier. Capacity Tier does not support local volumes directly.

https://helpcenter.veeam.com/docs/backu ... l?ver=95u4

One option may be to use the open source Minio package to do this though at one point I believe there were issues with the Windows version of Minio.

Joe
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 140 guests