I've just noticed that with forever incremental backup you cannot use the new GFS retention.
On the other hand if I need daily (synthetic) fulls to tape, I do need to configure the job as forever incremental.
Any ideas about how we could get GFS retention + daily full backups to tape combined working with a signle job?
Reverse incremental can't be used as it still needs (active) fulls for GFS.
I've thought about creating daily synthetic fulls with the backup job itself, which won't cause storage problems on ReFS, but I'm not sure about the impact.
-
- VeeaMVP
- Posts: 1031
- Liked: 322 times
- Joined: Jan 31, 2011 11:17 am
- Full Name: Max
- Contact:
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 15127
- Liked: 3232 times
- Joined: Sep 01, 2014 11:46 am
- Full Name: Hannes Kasparick
- Location: Austria
- Contact:
Re: Backup: GFS retention + synthetic full to tape
Hello,
yes, GFS is is the opposite of "incremental forever"
For daily synthetic fulls: I heard it from customers using it since more than a year to offload to capacity tier on a daily basis. Nobody can be sure about the impact as it depends on the amount of data you, REFS version etc. But I would say, that it is worth a try.
Best regards,
Hannes
yes, GFS is is the opposite of "incremental forever"

For daily synthetic fulls: I heard it from customers using it since more than a year to offload to capacity tier on a daily basis. Nobody can be sure about the impact as it depends on the amount of data you, REFS version etc. But I would say, that it is worth a try.
Best regards,
Hannes
-
- VeeaMVP
- Posts: 1031
- Liked: 322 times
- Joined: Jan 31, 2011 11:17 am
- Full Name: Max
- Contact:
Re: Backup: GFS retention + synthetic full to tape
Hi Hannes,
How much data does this customer have and how long is the retention on disk?
In theory with ReFS it shouldn't make a difference whether I do 14 days forever incremental or 14 days daily synthetic full.
Or do I miss something here?
How much data does this customer have and how long is the retention on disk?
In theory with ReFS it shouldn't make a difference whether I do 14 days forever incremental or 14 days daily synthetic full.
Or do I miss something here?
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 15127
- Liked: 3232 times
- Joined: Sep 01, 2014 11:46 am
- Full Name: Hannes Kasparick
- Location: Austria
- Contact:
Re: Backup: GFS retention + synthetic full to tape
Hello,
the retention on disk is as always: the software ensures, that you don't have less restore points than configured. You can simulate it with the restore point simulator https://rps.dewin.me/ (check the REFS checkbox)
It takes some space for metadata, but in general you are right. No real difference in disk space usage
Best regards,
Hannes
the retention on disk is as always: the software ensures, that you don't have less restore points than configured. You can simulate it with the restore point simulator https://rps.dewin.me/ (check the REFS checkbox)
It takes some space for metadata, but in general you are right. No real difference in disk space usage
Best regards,
Hannes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests