Comprehensive data protection for all workloads
Post Reply
DDIT
Expert
Posts: 147
Liked: 28 times
Joined: Oct 29, 2015 5:58 pm
Full Name: Michael Yorke
Contact:

GFS: multiple month-end backups

Post by DDIT »

Hello,

I received an notification for low space on my off-site repo and when looking at the backup files was surprised to see
2x VBK's for each month-end
3x VBK's for each week-end
3x VBK's for the most recent year-end (2020) + 2x VBK's for the previous year-end

Storage is ReFS. Screenshot below shows all backup files of a particular server, but this is affecting all servers.
https://i.imgur.com/D18bpbw.png

My Backup Copy job is configured to run everyday (copies the last 10 restore points from on-site repo), then keep the last 4 weekly, 12 monthly and 20 yearly backups.

Shall I open a case, or is the answer much more obvious?
Thanks in advance.
foggy
Veeam Software
Posts: 21071
Liked: 2115 times
Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
Contact:

Re: GFS: multiple month-end backups

Post by foggy »

Hi Michael, we do not know the job schedule and other configuration options, however, the fact that you have several, say, weekly full backups for the same server dated by the same day with a few minutes between them looks unexpected to me. I'd ask our engineers for a closer look.
Gostev
Chief Product Officer
Posts: 31556
Liked: 6719 times
Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
Location: Baar, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: GFS: multiple month-end backups

Post by Gostev »

While it is clearly some problem that needs to be investigated, referring to the disk space issue specifically I wanted to remind that synthetic full backups don't take any physical disk space on ReFS.
DDIT
Expert
Posts: 147
Liked: 28 times
Joined: Oct 29, 2015 5:58 pm
Full Name: Michael Yorke
Contact:

Re: GFS: multiple month-end backups

Post by DDIT » 1 person likes this post

Thanks. I appreciate these backups may only be taking up negligible space due to ReFS, but wouldn't have checked without the notification of low space. Support case created #04596953
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], jklaw91, khang1231, mromriell, sarapinho and 102 guests