Comprehensive data protection for all workloads
Post Reply
dasfliege
Service Provider
Posts: 238
Liked: 53 times
Joined: Nov 17, 2014 1:48 pm
Full Name: Florin
Location: Switzerland
Contact:

Wrong Load information in v11

Post by dasfliege »

We've updated several of our B&R installations to v11. All of them do have the same problem.
The Load/Bottleneck analysis is always showing 0% load on the proxy. That applies to VMWare as well as to Hyper-V integrations.

Do you guys have the same problem? Is Veeam aware of this issue?
HannesK
Product Manager
Posts: 14322
Liked: 2890 times
Joined: Sep 01, 2014 11:46 am
Full Name: Hannes Kasparick
Location: Austria
Contact:

Re: Wrong Load information in v11

Post by HannesK »

Hello,
might be an issue... do you have a case number? In my environment, the source is really that slow, that a proxy value at 0% is realistic, but every value at 0% sounds strange.

Best regards,
Hannes
dasfliege
Service Provider
Posts: 238
Liked: 53 times
Joined: Nov 17, 2014 1:48 pm
Full Name: Florin
Location: Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Wrong Load information in v11

Post by dasfliege »

No, i haven't opened a case yet, as it's "just" a cosmetic issue. I thought that veeam surely is already aware of that. But if that is not the case, i will report it.
HannesK
Product Manager
Posts: 14322
Liked: 2890 times
Joined: Sep 01, 2014 11:46 am
Full Name: Hannes Kasparick
Location: Austria
Contact:

Re: Wrong Load information in v11

Post by HannesK »

At least not "well known". If you could refer in your case to case number #04709073, that would help.
dasfliege
Service Provider
Posts: 238
Liked: 53 times
Joined: Nov 17, 2014 1:48 pm
Full Name: Florin
Location: Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Wrong Load information in v11

Post by dasfliege »

Opened case #04709286
dasfliege
Service Provider
Posts: 238
Liked: 53 times
Joined: Nov 17, 2014 1:48 pm
Full Name: Florin
Location: Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Wrong Load information in v11

Post by dasfliege »

Is there someone with v11 who is NOT seeing this problem? We have it on every v11 installation and it still seems like veeam isn't really aware that it seems to be a general v11 problem.
veremin
Product Manager
Posts: 20284
Liked: 2258 times
Joined: Oct 26, 2012 3:28 pm
Full Name: Vladimir Eremin
Contact:

Re: Wrong Load information in v11

Post by veremin »

We haven't seen anything like that reported before, and with the current number of V11 installations I'd expect to see at least several similar posts by now. So I recommend continuing investigation with our support team to see if it is possibly some environment-specific issue. Thanks!
tsightler
VP, Product Management
Posts: 6013
Liked: 2843 times
Joined: Jun 05, 2009 12:57 pm
Full Name: Tom Sightler
Contact:

Re: Wrong Load information in v11

Post by tsightler »

Just to be sure I took a quick glance at the stats on my jobs in the lab and, so far, the bottleneck stats look correct on everything, at roughly what I would expect. Will be interesting to see what support find.
SteveR
Novice
Posts: 3
Liked: 1 time
Joined: Mar 24, 2021 5:55 pm
Contact:

Re: Wrong Load information in v11

Post by SteveR » 1 person likes this post

I'm seeing the issue on 3 different installations. The proxy has reported 0% on every run since they were upgraded. Prior to the upgrade, it was anywhere between 40-50%. This is on both backup and replication jobs for VMware. The source, network, and target percentages have all increased.
Egor Yakovlev
Veeam Software
Posts: 2537
Liked: 683 times
Joined: Jun 14, 2013 9:30 am
Full Name: Egor Yakovlev
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Contact:

Re: Wrong Load information in v11

Post by Egor Yakovlev »

Hi Steve,

Do you have support case opened as well?
Please share ID in this thread or send me via PM.

/Thanks!
Egor Yakovlev
Veeam Software
Posts: 2537
Liked: 683 times
Joined: Jun 14, 2013 9:30 am
Full Name: Egor Yakovlev
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Contact:

Re: Wrong Load information in v11

Post by Egor Yakovlev » 1 person likes this post

Update.

Symptoms: Backup\Replication jobs display 0% Proxy load under bottleneck statistics.
Cause: Internal issue, wrong number calculation formula. Issue ID 303112.
Status: Will be fixed in the following update.

/Thanks!
tsightler
VP, Product Management
Posts: 6013
Liked: 2843 times
Joined: Jun 05, 2009 12:57 pm
Full Name: Tom Sightler
Contact:

Re: Wrong Load information in v11

Post by tsightler »

Seems to mostly impact Windows proxies, which is why I don't see the behavior in my lab, as my lab has only Linux proxies for normal use. A quick test with a Windows based proxy shows the same behavior reported here.
Gostev
Chief Product Officer
Posts: 31561
Liked: 6725 times
Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
Location: Baar, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Wrong Load information in v11

Post by Gostev » 1 person likes this post

Egor Yakovlev wrote: Mar 25, 2021 2:06 pmwrong number calculation formula
Actually, there's no "calculation formula" for this particular counter, because it merely shows the proxy CPU load. Are you sure there's no misunderstanding? May be double-check with R&D to make sure everyone is on the same page... just in case :)
Egor Yakovlev
Veeam Software
Posts: 2537
Liked: 683 times
Joined: Jun 14, 2013 9:30 am
Full Name: Egor Yakovlev
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Contact:

Re: Wrong Load information in v11

Post by Egor Yakovlev » 1 person likes this post

True, I have picked slightly wrong wording here.
It was a change in the logic that retrieved said number, causing us to get 0% all the time.
dasfliege
Service Provider
Posts: 238
Liked: 53 times
Joined: Nov 17, 2014 1:48 pm
Full Name: Florin
Location: Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Wrong Load information in v11

Post by dasfliege »

I'm still working with veeam support on that case. Not because of the display-thing, as this has already been confirmed to be an issue, but because jobs are generally slower since updating to v11.
I've checked that in three different installations and all of the backupjobs generally takes 30-100% longer after updating to v11 than they did before.
Is anyone having the "dislplay-issue" also observing slower backupjob performance since v11?
HannesK
Product Manager
Posts: 14322
Liked: 2890 times
Joined: Sep 01, 2014 11:46 am
Full Name: Hannes Kasparick
Location: Austria
Contact:

Re: Wrong Load information in v11

Post by HannesK »

I have seen a situation yesterday, where UseUnbufferedAccess = 0 fixed performance issues.

That key is not a general solution or recommendation. It seems to depend on the storage technology used.

As the case is already pretty long... can you maybe tell us what kind of repository / storage you are using?
dasfliege
Service Provider
Posts: 238
Liked: 53 times
Joined: Nov 17, 2014 1:48 pm
Full Name: Florin
Location: Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Wrong Load information in v11

Post by dasfliege »

It's not storage dependent. I see the exact same issues in every installation where we updated from v10 to v11. Proxy load is always 0% and jobs do take generally 30-100% longer then before the update.
But to anwer your question, we observed the issue on ReFS repositories lying on StorageSpace JBOD or Synology as well as on Linux repository lying on Nimble Storage.
HannesK
Product Manager
Posts: 14322
Liked: 2890 times
Joined: Sep 01, 2014 11:46 am
Full Name: Hannes Kasparick
Location: Austria
Contact:

Re: Wrong Load information in v11

Post by HannesK »

the proxy issue is confirmed already as UI issue.

My post was about
all of the backupjobs generally takes 30-100% longer after updating to v11 than they did before.
Do you have a chance to test the key? You can ask support to cross-check with case #04741000 - but I'm fairly optimistic from what you say that you use as hardware.
dasfliege
Service Provider
Posts: 238
Liked: 53 times
Joined: Nov 17, 2014 1:48 pm
Full Name: Florin
Location: Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Wrong Load information in v11

Post by dasfliege »

Sure. I will give it a try.
dasfliege
Service Provider
Posts: 238
Liked: 53 times
Joined: Nov 17, 2014 1:48 pm
Full Name: Florin
Location: Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Wrong Load information in v11

Post by dasfliege »

Unfortunately that didn't help. Performance is still not at the level it was with v10
HannesK
Product Manager
Posts: 14322
Liked: 2890 times
Joined: Sep 01, 2014 11:46 am
Full Name: Hannes Kasparick
Location: Austria
Contact:

Re: Wrong Load information in v11

Post by HannesK »

hmm okay - then I only have the block alignment left mentioned in a StoreOnce performance issue thread post410249.html#p410249

Note: as only support analyzes the logs, I only do "educated guessing". :-)
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 130 guests