-
- Novice
- Posts: 7
- Liked: never
- Joined: Nov 23, 2009 7:20 pm
- Full Name: Nick Barsotti
- Contact:
hardware v8 and EFI, VSS errors?
Is anyone have problems thanking a VSS enabled backup of Windows machine when using vmware hardware v8 and EFI (not BIOS). I think my earlier post got deleted because I posted the error message. Please let me know if you are also having errors or if you have fully working hardware v8 and EFI, VSS backups working please let me know. I believe this is a bug in the vss writer deployed by veeam, something that was never fully tested by veeam before they released support.
-
- Chief Product Officer
- Posts: 31835
- Liked: 7325 times
- Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Baar, Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: hardware v8 and EFI, VSS errors?
Your previous post was removed because it reported a technical issue with the product without including support case ID, as requested when you click New Topic. There are multiple reasons why this requirement is in place, and it is really easy to open a support case. Please, be sure to submit full logs to our support, and include support case ID in this topic if you'd like to pursue this issue further.
With Veeam, what is pushed to guest in runtime is small coordination process that requests Microsoft VSS framework to prepare system for hot backup with generic VSS API call. VSS framework then performs applications and OS freeze, and if something does not work, reports any errors encountered back to us. The error that you see is the system error from VSS framework.
Out of curiosity, why would you use EFI in a VM. This is certainly the first time I encounter this. Does it provide certain benefits?
One thing for sure, Veeam does NOT deploy VSS writers, or any other VSS components for that matter, to guest. You are probably confusing us with other backup solutions which do deploy VSS providers. In fact, first thing you should do with VSS issues is make sure you do not have those 3rd party VSS modules installed on the system, as they are known to cause such issues to VSS framework.nbarsotti wrote:I believe this is a bug in the vss writer deployed by veeam, something that was never fully tested by veeam before they released support.
With Veeam, what is pushed to guest in runtime is small coordination process that requests Microsoft VSS framework to prepare system for hot backup with generic VSS API call. VSS framework then performs applications and OS freeze, and if something does not work, reports any errors encountered back to us. The error that you see is the system error from VSS framework.
Out of curiosity, why would you use EFI in a VM. This is certainly the first time I encounter this. Does it provide certain benefits?
-
- Novice
- Posts: 7
- Liked: never
- Joined: Nov 23, 2009 7:20 pm
- Full Name: Nick Barsotti
- Contact:
Re: hardware v8 and EFI, VSS errors?
The biggest reason to use EFI instead of BIOS is to be able to use a larger than ~2.2 TB hard disk as a boot disk. EFI allows for booting off GPT disks. A very larger percentage of all Intel 6 seriers chipsets use EFI and I understand correctly virtually all Intel 7 series chipsets will use EFI.
You are correct that I was confusing the small runtime component that is pushed to the VM with a actual VSS writer. Regardless of what I called it I believe it is deficient in properly enumerating the boot record and partitons of a EFI based vm.
This problem I am having can be linked with the support case ID#5160270 that I opened yesterday.
You are correct that I was confusing the small runtime component that is pushed to the VM with a actual VSS writer. Regardless of what I called it I believe it is deficient in properly enumerating the boot record and partitons of a EFI based vm.
This problem I am having can be linked with the support case ID#5160270 that I opened yesterday.
-
- Chief Product Officer
- Posts: 31835
- Liked: 7325 times
- Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Baar, Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: hardware v8 and EFI, VSS errors?
Hmm but VMware does not support VMDK larget than 2TB in size anyway, so what is the point?nbarsotti wrote:The biggest reason to use EFI instead of BIOS is to be able to use a larger than ~2.2 TB hard disk as a boot disk.
-
- Novice
- Posts: 7
- Liked: never
- Joined: Nov 23, 2009 7:20 pm
- Full Name: Nick Barsotti
- Contact:
Re: hardware v8 and EFI, VSS errors?
Hi Gostev,
First from a purely informational standpoint do you know if EFI based virtual machines on hardware v8 on vSphere 5.0 have ever been tested by Veeam? The documentation says noting about BIOS vs EFI.
Second, to your answer your question in the last post; why not? EFI is future for all computers, so why not get started now. It boots faster and allows for a more robust preboot environment. As a technology software company I don't you should be discouraging customers to try new technology. Hey Veeam B&R v5 was good enough why upgrade v6?; that not what you want your customers saying. Let all encourage new and better technology.
First from a purely informational standpoint do you know if EFI based virtual machines on hardware v8 on vSphere 5.0 have ever been tested by Veeam? The documentation says noting about BIOS vs EFI.
Second, to your answer your question in the last post; why not? EFI is future for all computers, so why not get started now. It boots faster and allows for a more robust preboot environment. As a technology software company I don't you should be discouraging customers to try new technology. Hey Veeam B&R v5 was good enough why upgrade v6?; that not what you want your customers saying. Let all encourage new and better technology.
-
- Chief Product Officer
- Posts: 31835
- Liked: 7325 times
- Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Baar, Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: hardware v8 and EFI, VSS errors?
Pretty sure it was not.nbarsotti wrote:First from a purely informational standpoint do you know if EFI based virtual machines on hardware v8 on vSphere 5.0 have ever been tested by Veeam?
For me personally, the key word is "better", and not "new" where it makes sense, I do certainly encourage this. For example, upgrading Veeam B&R v5 to v6 increases backup and replication performance for most customers (not to mention access to 70+ new features that you can actually use). However, to me using EFI for VM gives no tangible benefits (you may have different opinion here).nbarsotti wrote:Hey Veeam B&R v5 was good enough why upgrade v6?; that not what you want your customers saying. Let all encourage new and better technology.
Anyway, I did not mean to start the argument - I only brought this up because what you said was "the biggest reason" for you to go with EFI for this VM cannot be leveraged due to existing VMware limitations on the virtual disk size anyway. From your comment, I was not sure that you realize that.
-
- VP, Product Management
- Posts: 6035
- Liked: 2860 times
- Joined: Jun 05, 2009 12:57 pm
- Full Name: Tom Sightler
- Contact:
Re: hardware v8 and EFI, VSS errors?
Honestly, I can't think of any significant advantage of EFI within the current limits of vSphere and current OS versions, however, Windows 8 will bring changes. The Windows 8 "secure boot" functionality requires EFI to function and it's my understanding that Windows 8 will require compliance with "secure boot" to get the "Designed for Windows 8" logo certification. Secure boot will actually verify that the drivers being loaded by the OS are signed prior to loading them into the OS, supposedly providing more resistance to tampering.
Pretty diagrams at http://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-cl ... i-concerns
For now, I suspect that Veeam VSS does not properly handle the ASR Writer requirements for EFI. Honestly, I've never seen or heard a single user even mention EFI before this post, but I'm glad to know there are some forward looking users out there, it's certainly something that will have to be addressed sooner or later.
Pretty diagrams at http://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-cl ... i-concerns
For now, I suspect that Veeam VSS does not properly handle the ASR Writer requirements for EFI. Honestly, I've never seen or heard a single user even mention EFI before this post, but I'm glad to know there are some forward looking users out there, it's certainly something that will have to be addressed sooner or later.
-
- Chief Product Officer
- Posts: 31835
- Liked: 7325 times
- Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Baar, Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: hardware v8 and EFI, VSS errors?
We have confirmed that EFI is causing some issue for our VSS process. I am going to include this into the release notes until this issue is addressed in the future versions of our product. Thanks for finding this one!
-
- Novice
- Posts: 9
- Liked: never
- Joined: May 06, 2010 7:58 pm
- Full Name: Joshua Lalanne
- Location: Houston, TX
- Contact:
Re: hardware v8 and EFI, VSS errors?
Curious if there is a fix for this yet?
-
- VP, Product Management
- Posts: 27405
- Liked: 2806 times
- Joined: Mar 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Full Name: Vitaliy Safarov
- Contact:
Re: hardware v8 and EFI, VSS errors?
No, most likely it will addressed in our future releases only.
-
- Lurker
- Posts: 1
- Liked: never
- Joined: Apr 17, 2012 1:21 pm
- Full Name: Zoltan Zolcer
- Location: Zurich, Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: hardware v8 and EFI, VSS errors?
One of our customers just happened to run into this problem, so just let me add a little grist to nbarsotti's mill.
I had already begun to type that he was given a pre-installed virtual appliance by his provider and therefore didn't have a choice of BIOS vs. EFI in the first place, but I just learned that's not the case. He did install the OS himself, specifically choosing EFI. He, too, thought it would be clever to choose new technology over something soon to be phased out.
In any case ... how long until somebody actually WILL end up with a virtual appliance that comes with EFI? That's next to impossible to change!
There doesn't seem to be a way to exclude partitions in B&R, only disks, but that's exactly what might save our customer's life. While EFI support may not be too high up on Veeam's list of things to be added, exclusion of EFI partitions could be a lot faster and easier to implement.
I had already begun to type that he was given a pre-installed virtual appliance by his provider and therefore didn't have a choice of BIOS vs. EFI in the first place, but I just learned that's not the case. He did install the OS himself, specifically choosing EFI. He, too, thought it would be clever to choose new technology over something soon to be phased out.
In any case ... how long until somebody actually WILL end up with a virtual appliance that comes with EFI? That's next to impossible to change!
There doesn't seem to be a way to exclude partitions in B&R, only disks, but that's exactly what might save our customer's life. While EFI support may not be too high up on Veeam's list of things to be added, exclusion of EFI partitions could be a lot faster and easier to implement.
-
- Chief Product Officer
- Posts: 31835
- Liked: 7325 times
- Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Baar, Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: hardware v8 and EFI, VSS errors?
EFI boot support was added as a part of version 6.1 patch 1 update.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: SergeyGCHR and 48 guests