We replicate several critical machines across 20Mbps fiber nightly, from our main site to a remote site that has a single ESX 4.1 host. Currently, on that host is a single Windows 2008R2 VM that is basically acting like a local DC, DNS, DHCP and small file server for the remote site... it sees very little traffic most of the time. The host that this VM resides on contains quite a bit of local storage, and this is where we currently replicate the VMs from the main site to.
With the new proxy architecture, I'm wondering if I need to install a dedicated VM to act as the proxy, or if there's any reason I can't simply use the existing VM there to act as a proxy in the middle of the night when no one is accessing the server, anyway? Adding another VM is trivial, of course, but I don't want to do that if I don't have to... Any advice?
-
pufferdude
- Expert
- Posts: 222
- Liked: 15 times
- Joined: Jul 02, 2009 8:26 pm
- Full Name: Jim
- Contact:
-
Gostev
- Chief Product Officer
- Posts: 31559
- Liked: 6724 times
- Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Baar, Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: Dedicated VM for proxy?
Hi Jim, personally I would go with the existing VM. There is really no point in dedicated proxy when we are talking about only 1 VM to process. Besides, given your WAN link bandwidth, the load from backup proxy component will be close to zero anyway. Thanks!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 113 guests