Backup of NAS, file shares, file servers and object storage.
Post Reply
matteu
Veeam Legend
Posts: 725
Liked: 118 times
Joined: May 11, 2018 8:42 am
Contact:

File proxy location

Post by matteu »

Hello,

I need to implement file proxy for NAS with 200To licence.
I would like to know if I need to dedicate a proxy to this job explicitely or I can use standard proxy with file proxy role too ?

Then, I have a physical tape server and it will be used only for monthly and yearly backup to tape. I think it's maybe better to use it as file proxy ?
He has only 600Go hard disk and it's on sata/sas (I didn't remember) storage.

What is the best between :
1)1 dedicated file proxy (All have 3 CPU + 5Go RAM now + 80 Go HDD (can be on SSD))
2)mutual proxy + file proxy
3)physical tape server with 40cpu + 96Go RAM + 600Go HDD
HannesK
Product Manager
Posts: 14319
Liked: 2890 times
Joined: Sep 01, 2014 11:46 am
Full Name: Hannes Kasparick
Location: Austria
Contact:

Re: File proxy location

Post by HannesK »

Hello,
more is always better :-)

You can use any managed Windows server as file proxy. The more resources, the better of course. If your tape server is bored, then I would use it. Cache repository also needs CPU & RAM.

I don't know what your repository is. But if it is the recommended design with a physical box with internal disks, then I would put everything there.

Best regards,
Hannes
matteu
Veeam Legend
Posts: 725
Liked: 118 times
Joined: May 11, 2018 8:42 am
Contact:

Re: File proxy location

Post by matteu »

Repository is an appollo with SOBR.

I'm not sure to understand your last idea.

Do you mean use repository as file proxy ? It's not possible for me because it's used as hardened repository.
HannesK
Product Manager
Posts: 14319
Liked: 2890 times
Joined: Sep 01, 2014 11:46 am
Full Name: Hannes Kasparick
Location: Austria
Contact:

Re: File proxy location

Post by HannesK »

ok, with hardened repo, you need additional proxies then, right. cache repositories can run on the Apollo servers
matteu
Veeam Legend
Posts: 725
Liked: 118 times
Joined: May 11, 2018 8:42 am
Contact:

Re: File proxy location

Post by matteu »

Is it not better to use my tape server as tape + file proxy + cache repository for file proxy ?
HannesK
Product Manager
Posts: 14319
Liked: 2890 times
Joined: Sep 01, 2014 11:46 am
Full Name: Hannes Kasparick
Location: Austria
Contact:

Re: File proxy location

Post by HannesK »

HannesK wrote: If your tape server is bored, then I would use it
sure, 40 cores tape server is better than 3 cores virtual file proxy (not sure whether that is the question) :-)

3 core machines sounds like a strange number to me... anything less than 6 cores makes little sense to me from a management / price / performance / operating system overhead perspective
matteu
Veeam Legend
Posts: 725
Liked: 118 times
Joined: May 11, 2018 8:42 am
Contact:

Re: File proxy location

Post by matteu »

I didn't design the solution but I know there are 8 proxy with each 3 cores + 6 GB RAM and there is only 1 target repository with 2x200TB volume (hp appolo 4500).
We will see during next week where is the bottleneck (tomorow or in 2 weeks).
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests