-
- Novice
- Posts: 3
- Liked: never
- Joined: Dec 22, 2018 12:48 am
- Full Name: Demetrius Weaver
- Contact:
moving data from capacity tier to archive tier
Moderator split from object-storage-f52/storage-account-ques ... 82401.html
I had the same question and Google brought me here.
How does Veeam actually move the data from "Capacity" to "Archive"? Does it just use Microsoft's APIs to move the data on Microsoft's side, or does it download and re-upload the data?
Would there be any cost difference having the "Capacity" and "Archive" in the same storage account vs a separate account? In other words, would Microsoft charge more moving data from one storage account to another compared to within a single storage account?
I'm also curious how costs would be affected when using "hot" vs "cool" for the Capacity tier. When the data is moved from "Capacity" to "Archive" would there be a significant cost difference moving the data from "cool" > "archive compared with "hot" > "archive"?
I had the same question and Google brought me here.
How does Veeam actually move the data from "Capacity" to "Archive"? Does it just use Microsoft's APIs to move the data on Microsoft's side, or does it download and re-upload the data?
Would there be any cost difference having the "Capacity" and "Archive" in the same storage account vs a separate account? In other words, would Microsoft charge more moving data from one storage account to another compared to within a single storage account?
I'm also curious how costs would be affected when using "hot" vs "cool" for the Capacity tier. When the data is moved from "Capacity" to "Archive" would there be a significant cost difference moving the data from "cool" > "archive compared with "hot" > "archive"?
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 14844
- Liked: 3086 times
- Joined: Sep 01, 2014 11:46 am
- Full Name: Hannes Kasparick
- Location: Austria
- Contact:
Re: moving data from capacity tier to archive tier
Hello,
the data is moved by proxy appliances
I'm not aware of additional costs "per account", but that's something to ask Microsoft (it's their pricing structure).
The cost difference depends on the retention and access pattern you have. If you restore very often, then the costs are higher (especially on cool and archive tier) than if you never restore. In general: the shorter the retention, the more it makes sense to use hot. Cool has minimum retention you pay for 30 days. Archive 180 days. So it really depends on your retention settings and access pattern.
Overall: if you are worried about costs at Azure, then I would look at cheaper alternatives. Wasabi and Backblaze are popular in the Veeam community. Also other object storage providers can be an alternative.
Best regards,
Hannes
the data is moved by proxy appliances
I'm not aware of additional costs "per account", but that's something to ask Microsoft (it's their pricing structure).
The cost difference depends on the retention and access pattern you have. If you restore very often, then the costs are higher (especially on cool and archive tier) than if you never restore. In general: the shorter the retention, the more it makes sense to use hot. Cool has minimum retention you pay for 30 days. Archive 180 days. So it really depends on your retention settings and access pattern.
Overall: if you are worried about costs at Azure, then I would look at cheaper alternatives. Wasabi and Backblaze are popular in the Veeam community. Also other object storage providers can be an alternative.
Best regards,
Hannes
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 20415
- Liked: 2302 times
- Joined: Oct 26, 2012 3:28 pm
- Full Name: Vladimir Eremin
- Contact:
Re: moving data from capacity tier to archive tier
It seems that:
* Azure charges you for in-cloud communication happening between different regions: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/prici ... age/blobs/
* Azure charges more for reading objects present on Cold Tier: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/prici ... age/blobs/
But I agree with Hannes it's better to reach a Microsoft representative with these questions.
Thanks!
* Azure charges you for in-cloud communication happening between different regions: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/prici ... age/blobs/
* Azure charges more for reading objects present on Cold Tier: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/prici ... age/blobs/
But I agree with Hannes it's better to reach a Microsoft representative with these questions.
Thanks!
-
- Influencer
- Posts: 10
- Liked: never
- Joined: Feb 22, 2023 7:58 am
- Full Name: Patrick Eichenseher
- Contact:
[MERGED] Storage Account: Cool or Hot access tier
Hello,
is hot or cold access tier better for the following usecase:
- 17 TB Data with 30 days immutability
- daily incremental Backups
- weekly full Backup
Thanks!
is hot or cold access tier better for the following usecase:
- 17 TB Data with 30 days immutability
- daily incremental Backups
- weekly full Backup
Thanks!
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 20415
- Liked: 2302 times
- Joined: Oct 26, 2012 3:28 pm
- Full Name: Vladimir Eremin
- Contact:
Re: Storage Account: Cool or Hot access tier
Are you talking about Microsoft Azure? How are you planning to use it? As a standalone object storage repository or as a Capacity Tier? Thanks!
-
- Influencer
- Posts: 10
- Liked: never
- Joined: Feb 22, 2023 7:58 am
- Full Name: Patrick Eichenseher
- Contact:
Re: Storage Account: Cool or Hot access tier
Yes, and as a Capacity Tier
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 20415
- Liked: 2302 times
- Joined: Oct 26, 2012 3:28 pm
- Full Name: Vladimir Eremin
- Contact:
Re: moving data from capacity tier to archive tier
I've merged your topic into the existing thread where similar questions were discussed.
Kindly, find our general recommendations regarding access tiers above and ask for additional clarification, if any is needed.
Thanks!
Kindly, find our general recommendations regarding access tiers above and ask for additional clarification, if any is needed.
Thanks!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests