-
- Veeam Legend
- Posts: 857
- Liked: 183 times
- Joined: Jul 19, 2016 8:39 am
- Full Name: Michael
- Location: Rheintal, Austria
- Contact:
planned failover CDP - wooooow
Hi everyone,
using planned failover is a nice thing - I was using it many times for maintenance windows in the past, but it took a while to have those two replication passes gone by until the vm got started (which took some minutes in my case and so it wasn't a "clean" transition).
Now CDP failover itself has some offset in terms of replication due to the fact that you're not replication every millisecond, so you might loose a bit of data one you failover. That's why I was curious to see how the planned failover works and I did a small test. I saw the following (shortened):
- vm was shut down
- creating long-term restore point (+34 sec)
- starting replication (+20 sec)
- failing over (+20 sec)
WOOOOOW!!
So doing a planned failover here is done in a bit more than one minute (and this is for sure not the fastest hardware in the world) - that is fantastic! Very well done veeam, thanks very much, what a great product!
using planned failover is a nice thing - I was using it many times for maintenance windows in the past, but it took a while to have those two replication passes gone by until the vm got started (which took some minutes in my case and so it wasn't a "clean" transition).
Now CDP failover itself has some offset in terms of replication due to the fact that you're not replication every millisecond, so you might loose a bit of data one you failover. That's why I was curious to see how the planned failover works and I did a small test. I saw the following (shortened):
- vm was shut down
- creating long-term restore point (+34 sec)
- starting replication (+20 sec)
- failing over (+20 sec)
WOOOOOW!!
So doing a planned failover here is done in a bit more than one minute (and this is for sure not the fastest hardware in the world) - that is fantastic! Very well done veeam, thanks very much, what a great product!
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 8815
- Liked: 2319 times
- Joined: May 13, 2017 4:51 pm
- Full Name: Fabian K.
- Location: Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: planned failover CDP - wooooow
Hi Michael
Thank you for your great feedback. I will share it with the rest of the team
Best,
Fabian
Thank you for your great feedback. I will share it with the rest of the team
Best,
Fabian
Product Management Analyst @ Veeam Software
-
- Novice
- Posts: 8
- Liked: 3 times
- Joined: May 02, 2016 9:59 am
- Full Name: Ralf Luithle
- Contact:
Re: planned failover CDP - wooooow
Be aware of this, if you loose your Veeam Server Running CDP you have no possiblity to failover. Place the Server on DR Site.
-
- Veeam Legend
- Posts: 857
- Liked: 183 times
- Joined: Jul 19, 2016 8:39 am
- Full Name: Michael
- Location: Rheintal, Austria
- Contact:
Re: planned failover CDP - wooooow
It is placed on the DR site, how did you come to the conclusion that it wasn't?
-
- Novice
- Posts: 5
- Liked: 1 time
- Joined: Nov 13, 2017 7:27 am
- Full Name: Shawn Hentze
- Contact:
Re: planned failover CDP - wooooow
What was the failback performance like?
In my experience, the failback takes exponentially longer than failover, due to calculating fingerprints/digests. Most likely just a configuration error on my side though.
In my experience, the failback takes exponentially longer than failover, due to calculating fingerprints/digests. Most likely just a configuration error on my side though.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 55
- Liked: 6 times
- Joined: Jun 18, 2009 2:27 pm
- Full Name: Yves Smolders
- Contact:
Re: planned failover CDP - wooooow
I was also surprised at the failback time, but okay, that's a bit of a luxury problem.
-
- Veeam Legend
- Posts: 857
- Liked: 183 times
- Joined: Jul 19, 2016 8:39 am
- Full Name: Michael
- Location: Rheintal, Austria
- Contact:
Re: planned failover CDP - wooooow
if your hardware is able to calculate the digests fast AND you're not having too much data, it should still be quite "fast". of course, not seconds, but maybe some minutes...
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 77 guests