Discussions related to using object storage as a backup target.
Post Reply
trackstar
Expert
Posts: 174
Liked: 4 times
Joined: Mar 11, 2013 9:47 pm
Contact:

Planning for offsite disaster recovery

Post by trackstar »

Hey guys,

Our environment consists of VMware vCenter/ESXi and Veeam. We run backup copies which are stored on an iSCSI drive from AWS.

We are looking to build a disaster recovery plan utilizing the cloud (AWS). Please comment /recommend :mrgreen: .

1) Utilize S3 within Veeam (on premise) for our backup.

2) From AWS, have a Windows Server with another Veeam Server (second server). We currently have an on premise Veeam Server

3) Restore the VMs within AWS if whenever the data center faces a disaster.
Seve CH
Expert
Posts: 101
Liked: 40 times
Joined: May 09, 2016 2:34 pm
Full Name: JM Severino
Location: Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Planning for offsite disaster recovery

Post by Seve CH »

I am no specialist on AWS... but why are you using iSCSI on AWS? I consider iSCSI ultra-fragile and using the internet to reach it (VPN or not) is something that would never cross my mind.
veremin
Product Manager
Posts: 20678
Liked: 2383 times
Joined: Oct 26, 2012 3:28 pm
Full Name: Vladimir Eremin
Contact:

Re: Planning for offsite disaster recovery

Post by veremin »

Yes, the configuration with ISCSI looks somewhat strange, the recommended approach is to add AWS S3 as an object storage repository and subsequently use it as a backup target. Thanks!
trackstar
Expert
Posts: 174
Liked: 4 times
Joined: Mar 11, 2013 9:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Planning for offsite disaster recovery

Post by trackstar »

Seve CH wrote: Apr 14, 2025 7:19 am I am no specialist on AWS... but why are you using iSCSI on AWS? I consider iSCSI ultra-fragile and using the internet to reach it (VPN or not) is something that would never cross my mind.

A decade ago we wanted to get away from a traditional NAS hardware. So AWS offers storage via iSCSI with NTFS/share permissions. Eventually we got a new hardware NAS and left the AWS as a backup feature.
Seve CH
Expert
Posts: 101
Liked: 40 times
Joined: May 09, 2016 2:34 pm
Full Name: JM Severino
Location: Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Planning for offsite disaster recovery

Post by Seve CH »

Hi Trackstar
I would use S3 for the backup copy jobs instead of iSCSI. I suspect it will be cheaper, you may require less storage, and it will be more performant than iSCSI (very latency sensitive). You can also implement hardened repos to protect your data against ransomware.
Having a fully provisioned Veeam Server on the cloud instead of deploying it only on demand can be onerous, but it depends on your RTO requirements, etc.
Best regards.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests