Comprehensive data protection for all workloads
Post Reply
FCU_JE
Enthusiast
Posts: 28
Liked: 9 times
Joined: Oct 09, 2024 6:17 pm
Contact:

[V13] [V12] Veeam Product Lifecycle Question

Post by FCU_JE »

This question blurs the lines a bit between a V13 and V12 question.

I understand Veeam generally wants customers on the latest version and I think there's a lot of merit to this, but this is putting a bit of a pinch on customers/administrators. Alleviating the pressure on us specifically around the nature of security patches/updates would be much appreciated.

The all versions sticky says that the V13 is the GA/RTM "from September 3, 2023" [sic - I'm interpreting as 2025-09-03].

The Veeam Product Lifecycle webpage says that V12 versions reach the "end of fix" date at the next GA date. I take this to mean that (per the letter of the policy) that V12's end of fix date is end of September 2025.

Is this an unintended consequence? Or is this a typo and V13 is not yet a GA until Q4 (that would be implied by the V13 FAQ Sticky)? Or is Veeam really going to push customers to V13 when the 13.0.1 patch drops in Q4?

What happens if there's a security vulnerability impacting V12 versions? Are customers going to be pressured to upgrade to V13 to remediate vulnerabilities? Is Veeam going to support V12 for security vulnerabilities ("(exceptions may be made on a case-by-case basis)" as noted on the Lifecycle page)?
Gostev
Chief Product Officer
Posts: 32546
Liked: 7864 times
Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
Location: Baar, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: [V13] [V12] Veeam Product Lifecycle Question

Post by Gostev » 1 person likes this post

We're patching all security vulnerabilities until End of Support (and sometimes slightly beyond) and have been doing so for all previous versions.

The exceptions mentioned in the Support Policy are for non-security related fixes.
FCU_JE
Enthusiast
Posts: 28
Liked: 9 times
Joined: Oct 09, 2024 6:17 pm
Contact:

Re: [V13] [V12] Veeam Product Lifecycle Question

Post by FCU_JE »

Noted - that gives a lot of reassurance. Maybe the lifecycle policy I linked could use a review on the terminology it uses to carve out security vulnerabilities into the end of support definition. I think the delineation of quality/bug fixes and security fixes is an important one.
Gostev
Chief Product Officer
Posts: 32546
Liked: 7864 times
Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
Location: Baar, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: [V13] [V12] Veeam Product Lifecycle Question

Post by Gostev »

Agree, @m_zolkin FYI
m_zolkin
Veeam Software
Posts: 38
Liked: 17 times
Joined: Aug 26, 2009 1:13 pm
Full Name: Mike Zolkin
Location: St. Petersburg, Florida
Contact:

Re: [V13] [V12] Veeam Product Lifecycle Question

Post by m_zolkin »

Good idea, thanks for the heads up. We will update the wording soon.
VP, WW Customer Technical Support
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Google [Bot] and 39 guests