Morgenstern72 wrote:It looks like the report does not modify the peak usage regarding to already changed CPUs and still takes the value of 12 CPUs instead of now 8 CPUs.
Morgenstern72 wrote:This leads to a recommendation that seems to be quite wrong. When I go on like this I would end with 2 CPUs
Morgenstern72 wrote:It's quite bad because good recommendations (of so far unchanged VMs) are mixed now with these ones and without a printout of an old report I am not able to see which VMs I can really resize.
Morgenstern72 wrote:At last there should be a warning that changes are not reflected in historical data.
Morgenstern72 wrote:A second report would be a nice workaround, especially if you could combine/chain it to the Oversize/Undersize Report
keithkleiman wrote:Late getting back, however the problem seems to be that the oversized report is still using memory consumed and not active which really eliminates the validity of determining if more memory should be allocated to a virtual machine.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests