Hi,
Until recently I was using a Files to Tape job to backup .vbks on tape, the files were about 4.5TB in total which stored fine on an LTO-7 tape with 6TB available space.
Then I decided it would be more appropriate to do a Backup to Tape job instead so I selected the same job which contained (in theory) the same .vbks to put on the same tape.
What I am not getting is that it requires two tapes do store the data with the Backup to Tape job, the job stops at 75% and then ask for another tape.
So to resume the problem the Files to Tape fits on one tape and the same data with a Backup to Tape requires two.
Is there some compression not available when running a Backup to Tape job ?
Thanks
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 38
- Liked: 1 time
- Joined: May 05, 2021 9:08 pm
- Full Name: Michel Houde
- Contact:
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 14837
- Liked: 3084 times
- Joined: Sep 01, 2014 11:46 am
- Full Name: Hannes Kasparick
- Location: Austria
- Contact:
Re: Backup to Tape vs Files to Tape
Hello,
hardware compression is a tape job setting. The impact should be small whether you set that option or not if you use Veeam built-in data reduction (default. the only exception normally should be deduplication appliances).
If you say 75%, does that mean that really more data gets copied? Or is it that the tape is not 100% full.
It's hard to guess things like that on a forum... do you have a Veeam support case number with more details?
Best regards,
Hannes
hardware compression is a tape job setting. The impact should be small whether you set that option or not if you use Veeam built-in data reduction (default. the only exception normally should be deduplication appliances).
If you say 75%, does that mean that really more data gets copied? Or is it that the tape is not 100% full.
It's hard to guess things like that on a forum... do you have a Veeam support case number with more details?
Best regards,
Hannes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests