danas wrote:The server we have has the cpu and memory to do what it needs, but its not great on disk space, so my thought was to use iSCSI and mount the LUN used for the 1.5TB vmdk currently being used.
I am not sure if I can use the tape as iSCSI, but I'll check into it.
Leave the proxy as a VM (and maybe spin up another?) so i can continue using hotadd, move B&R to physical so I can access the tape without impacting the network
move repository to physical and mount the backup LUN on the SAN via iSCSI so my backups aren't in an vmdk on vmfs.
Is that going to provide the best performance with the system I have? Is that a better way to go than Direct-SAN?
v.Eremin wrote:Once the migration process is finished, you will be able to use Direct SAN mode that is considered the fastest one.
Can veeam backup the physical backup server as well?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests