-
- Expert
- Posts: 164
- Liked: 9 times
- Joined: Jan 28, 2014 5:41 pm
- Contact:
Differential option?
Good morning,
It's not obvious to me how one can do a differential file backup to tape with Veeam.
Suggestions?
Thanks!
It's not obvious to me how one can do a differential file backup to tape with Veeam.
Suggestions?
Thanks!
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 7328
- Liked: 781 times
- Joined: May 21, 2014 11:03 am
- Full Name: Nikita Shestakov
- Location: Prague
- Contact:
-
- Expert
- Posts: 164
- Liked: 9 times
- Joined: Jan 28, 2014 5:41 pm
- Contact:
Re: Differential option?
Thanks for the quick reply.
Quoting from the link provided:
Quoting from the link provided:
I'm not finding anything about a differential (not resetting the archive bit until a full backup is done)"You can create both full and incremental backups of files on tape."
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 7328
- Liked: 781 times
- Joined: May 21, 2014 11:03 am
- Full Name: Nikita Shestakov
- Location: Prague
- Contact:
Re: Differential option?
Got it. Veeam doesn`t perform differential backups.
Isn`t incremental backup sufficient? Could you provide your use case, please? Thanks!
Isn`t incremental backup sufficient? Could you provide your use case, please? Thanks!
-
- Expert
- Posts: 164
- Liked: 9 times
- Joined: Jan 28, 2014 5:41 pm
- Contact:
Re: Differential option?
Hmmm, the more I think about it perhaps you are right that it might not be needed.
The point for us using differential file backup was 3-fold
Having a vbk of the file server to the latest tape would might work. I'm assuming we would need more tapes since the capacity of 1 tape would be exceeded. Can Veeam handle larger than tape .vbk spill over?
I'm very open to suggestions on an alternative way to somehow combine a guest OS file backup of our file server as well as a complete VM backup. We do also replicate the File Server to an alternate site daily with 2 restore points.
Thanks for the help!
The point for us using differential file backup was 3-fold
- 1. Always have the latest changed guest OS file on the newest tape.
2. Backup to tape is quicker and less space intensive than a full but would take a little longer than an Incremental. (At present our full file backup uses 2 LTO-5 tapes apposed to a Differential which only needs 1. Latest Full and latest Differential always are offsite)
3. If a complete restore is required, only would need 2 tapes. (Latest Full and the last Differential opposed to an Incremental which would need the whole chain of tapes. This may be moot if we have a .vbk on tape)
Having a vbk of the file server to the latest tape would might work. I'm assuming we would need more tapes since the capacity of 1 tape would be exceeded. Can Veeam handle larger than tape .vbk spill over?
I'm very open to suggestions on an alternative way to somehow combine a guest OS file backup of our file server as well as a complete VM backup. We do also replicate the File Server to an alternate site daily with 2 restore points.
Thanks for the help!
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 7328
- Liked: 781 times
- Joined: May 21, 2014 11:03 am
- Full Name: Nikita Shestakov
- Location: Prague
- Contact:
Re: Differential option?
Yes, if the tapes are in the same media pool.B.F. wrote:Can Veeam handle larger than tape .vbk spill over?
Regarding the strategy, it really depends on your needs, capabilities and policies. Our best practices are described here.
As far as I understood your backup plan is D2T(disk to tape). If you`d like to stay on it, I would suggest to use basic backup job using forever incremental backup method and backup to tape job for a historical backups. Restore from disk backups is faster and more flexible, leveraging Veeam Explorers for file- and item-level restore.
However, as I said I don`t know much about your capabilities and wishes. Thanks.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests