foggy wrote:William, it is not possible to share the library unless it supports partitioning. Thanks.
v.Eremin wrote:Why not to use single backup server instance to manage both tape activities? In the upcoming version we will add support for remote tape libraries (those that aren't connected directly to backup server). So, you can place back server wherever you want and orchestrate tape stuff from there.
v.Eremin wrote:I'm not sure whether I follow you on that. But one backup server would mean that all of the repositories added to it can be simply backed up using backup to tape jobs. Thanks.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests