Discussions specific to tape backups
Post Reply
UT2015
Expert
Posts: 129
Liked: 1 time
Joined: Dec 15, 2015 1:07 pm
Contact:

Sorting in Media Pool does not work as expected

Post by UT2015 » Jul 13, 2016 6:27 am

Hi,

I have a small but very annoying thing: The sorting of table columns in some views does not work as expected.

E.g. in Tape Infrastructure / Media Pools / Media Pool
or in Tape Infrastructure / Libraries / Media / Offline

it is not possible to sort the Tapes meaningful. I want to sort the tapes by timestamp, which would be the column "Media Set". But when sorting by this column, the column is not interpreted as a timestamp, but as a String!

E.g. when sorting ascending it is sorted in the following way:

"Media Set 01.05.2016"
"Media Set 01.06.2016"
"Media Set 02.05.2016"
"Media Set 02.06.2016"

...although it should be sorted in that way:

"Media Set 01.05.2016"
"Media Set 02.05.2016"
"Media Set 01.06.2016"
"Media Set 02.06.2016"

This should really be easy to fix...

Best Regards,
UT2015

lyapkost
Veeam Software
Posts: 152
Liked: 20 times
Joined: Nov 27, 2015 2:26 pm
Full Name: Konstantin
Location: Saint Petersburg
Contact:

Re: Sorting in Media Pool does not work as expected

Post by lyapkost » Jul 13, 2016 7:01 am

Hi!

The problem is in Media Sets sorting, not Media Pools. This is a known behaviour and will be fixed in one of our upcoming releases. As a workaround you may name your media sets as suggested by default - 'Media set # %id% %date%', so they would be sorted correctly by id and thus, by date automatically.

mike.r
Enthusiast
Posts: 33
Liked: 3 times
Joined: Jun 03, 2015 7:00 am
Contact:

Re: Sorting in Media Pool does not work as expected

Post by mike.r » Jul 13, 2016 10:22 am

The sorting by sequence number within a media set is not so nice too.

e.g.:
Media Set Sequence Number
Media Set 01.05.2016 2
Media Set 01.05.2016 1
Media Set 01.05.2016 5
Media Set 01.05.2016 3
Media Set 01.05.2016 4

As I can see, it is sorted by nothing.
Is this a "known behaviour" too and will be fixed ?

lyapkost
Veeam Software
Posts: 152
Liked: 20 times
Joined: Nov 27, 2015 2:26 pm
Full Name: Konstantin
Location: Saint Petersburg
Contact:

Re: Sorting in Media Pool does not work as expected

Post by lyapkost » Jul 13, 2016 10:49 am

If you insert %id% before date (as it shown in my example) media sets will be sorted properly.

mike.r
Enthusiast
Posts: 33
Liked: 3 times
Joined: Jun 03, 2015 7:00 am
Contact:

Re: Sorting in Media Pool does not work as expected

Post by mike.r » Jul 13, 2016 11:28 am

That was not my question.
We have only one media set (not matter what name it got).
Within this media set we have 5 tapes (Sequence Numbers).
The sorting of tapes in this one media set should be ascending by sequence numer (1-5),
or at least ascending by tape names or (better) configurable.
Now it is at random (or something I can not see)

UT2015
Expert
Posts: 129
Liked: 1 time
Joined: Dec 15, 2015 1:07 pm
Contact:

Re: Sorting in Media Pool does not work as expected

Post by UT2015 » Jul 13, 2016 12:00 pm

I can confirm that. Sorting by sequence number is not possible. When sorting by media set, the sequence number seems to be random.

lyapkost
Veeam Software
Posts: 152
Liked: 20 times
Joined: Nov 27, 2015 2:26 pm
Full Name: Konstantin
Location: Saint Petersburg
Contact:

Re: Sorting in Media Pool does not work as expected

Post by lyapkost » Jul 13, 2016 1:15 pm

Mike, sorry, I got it wrong first. So you are expecting for kinda advanced sorting. Thanks, that's an Interesting and new idea, we should think about implementing it.

UT2015
Expert
Posts: 129
Liked: 1 time
Joined: Dec 15, 2015 1:07 pm
Contact:

Re: Sorting in Media Pool does not work as expected

Post by UT2015 » Jul 14, 2016 5:43 am

kinda advanced sorting
Without this "advanced" sorting, displaying the column "sequence number" is not really useful.

Dima P.
Product Manager
Posts: 9605
Liked: 755 times
Joined: Feb 04, 2013 2:07 pm
Full Name: Dmitry Popov
Location: Prague
Contact:

Re: Sorting in Media Pool does not work as expected

Post by Dima P. » Jul 15, 2016 5:54 pm

Hi guys,

We are in internal discussions right now, so thanks for your input.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 4 guests