using B&R v8u2.
I've got a local disk repository holding about a month worth of restore points, using forward incremental. I also have synthetic fulls enabled to be created on saturday.
Besides disk, tape is also used for long term backup storage. The tape job is set to copy fulls and process incrementals as well.
I'm not sure what will happen regarding virtual synthetic fulls on tape in this case. It seems to be "on" by default and cannot be disabled.
two questions:
Having synthetic fulls enabled on disk, what is the virtual full to tape behavior like in this case? (is it different behavior compared to when synthetics on disk would not be enabled?)
Does it make sense to enable synthetic fulls on disk at all actually?
-
- Service Provider
- Posts: 454
- Liked: 86 times
- Joined: Jun 09, 2015 7:08 pm
- Full Name: JaySt
- Contact:
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 7328
- Liked: 781 times
- Joined: May 21, 2014 11:03 am
- Full Name: Nikita Shestakov
- Location: Prague
- Contact:
Re: Synthetic fulls on disk needed when tape is used?
Hello Jeffrey,
Since you have synthetic fulls, you can`t "enable" virtual full backups.
Thanks!
Virtual Full are produced only if you use backup copy job or forever incremental backup job as a source of the backup-to-tape-job.JaySt wrote:Having synthetic fulls enabled on disk, what is the virtual full to tape behavior like in this case? (is it different behavior compared to when synthetics on disk would not be enabled?)
Since you have synthetic fulls, you can`t "enable" virtual full backups.
It depends on your capabilities and needs. Currently we consider forever-incremental mode + surebackup for recoverability as the best practice.JaySt wrote:Does it make sense to enable synthetic fulls on disk at all actually?
Thanks!
-
- Service Provider
- Posts: 454
- Liked: 86 times
- Joined: Jun 09, 2015 7:08 pm
- Full Name: JaySt
- Contact:
Re: Synthetic fulls on disk needed when tape is used?
ok, that's clear.
I went on and created a backup copy job to a secondary disk location and started a tape job from there with the source of the tape job being the copy job (the secondary disk repository).
Although synth fulls were enabled on the backup jobs pointing to the primary repository, at the secondary location virtual fulls were created as shown in the tape job progress window of the tape job on the secondary site...
Should there be a difference in virtual full processing when source is a back-up job versus a copy job as a source?
I went on and created a backup copy job to a secondary disk location and started a tape job from there with the source of the tape job being the copy job (the secondary disk repository).
Although synth fulls were enabled on the backup jobs pointing to the primary repository, at the secondary location virtual fulls were created as shown in the tape job progress window of the tape job on the secondary site...
Should there be a difference in virtual full processing when source is a back-up job versus a copy job as a source?
Veeam Certified Engineer
-
- Service Provider
- Posts: 454
- Liked: 86 times
- Joined: Jun 09, 2015 7:08 pm
- Full Name: JaySt
- Contact:
Re: Synthetic fulls on disk needed when tape is used?
thanks! did not see your reply until i posted mine.Shestakov wrote:Hello Jeffrey, Virtual Full are produced only if you use backup copy job or forever incremental backup job as a source of the backup-to-tape-job.
Since you have synthetic fulls, you can`t "enable" virtual full backups.
Veeam Certified Engineer
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 7328
- Liked: 781 times
- Joined: May 21, 2014 11:03 am
- Full Name: Nikita Shestakov
- Location: Prague
- Contact:
Re: Synthetic fulls on disk needed when tape is used?
Note that backup copy job always produces forever incremental backup chains, just like the incremental backup job without full backups scheduled. The behavior of the backup to tape job will be same for these two.
If you use any other job as a source of backup-to-tape, no virtual fulls will be created.
Thanks!
If you use any other job as a source of backup-to-tape, no virtual fulls will be created.
Thanks!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests