Since I think i posted in the wrong sub I'll try my luck here:
Cross reference to this post: https://forums.veeam.com/physical-cloud ... 53043.html
Hi,
I'm using the Linux Agent (Server Lic) to backup one (later multiple, one is the test) Server over a WAN to our local B&R Repo. Agent was deployed and the Job is running managed from the B&R server.
Server is configured to backup indiviudal volumes (as there is a huge data volume I don't want to backup). However the Backup is larger than the source used space.
Since this is a WAN Backup i set High compression and optimization for WAN Target.
I configured /dev/sda1 (vFAT EFI partition /boot/efi with 500MB), /dev/sda2 (ext2 BOOT partition /boot with 485MB) and a LVM-Volume vg-rootfs (ext4 via /dev/mapper path with 200GB).
/ has about 7.2GB used space, the backupjob shows it has read 4GB at 29% - estimating about ~14GB or something like that in total. Process is running since this is a slow link for the initial Full-Backup
/boot and /boot/efi are about 160MB (together) used, the job log stated "Backed up sda 1000.5 MB at 1.4 MB/s" and the vbk was about 450MB.
This looks like it's backup up double the space? Is there anything I configured wrong? Do I have to switch to File-Level Backup? I thought since the agent is installed only used space is backed up?
Thanks!
Edit:
These are physical HPE ProLiant Servers, no virtual machines
I'm observing this on another Server, too (with entire computer selected):
/dev/sda1 (vFAT EFI partition /boot/efi with 500MB)
/dev/sda2 (ext2 BOOT partition /boot with 485MB)
Used space together is about 147MB, however while backing up the agent has transferred about 290MB. I don't understand this - the Agent does know about the Filesystem? Why does it backup double the space? The problem is - this Sever is sitting on a VERY slow link, like 800kbit/s upload SLOW
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 75
- Liked: 5 times
- Joined: Aug 08, 2018 10:19 am
- Contact:
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 6551
- Liked: 765 times
- Joined: May 19, 2015 1:46 pm
- Contact:
Re: Linux Agent backing up more data than used?
Hi,
Sorry for the long reply.
Thanks
Sorry for the long reply.
In other words, the resulting .vbk is around 14GB although the "/" has only 7.2 GB used out of 200GB, is that correct?I configured /dev/sda1 (vFAT EFI partition /boot/efi with 500MB), /dev/sda2 (ext2 BOOT partition /boot with 485MB) and a LVM-Volume vg-rootfs (ext4 via /dev/mapper path with 200GB)
/ has about 7.2GB used space, the backupjob shows it has read 4GB at 29% - estimating about ~14GB or something like that in total. Process is running since this is a slow link for the initial Full-Backup
Thanks
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 75
- Liked: 5 times
- Joined: Aug 08, 2018 10:19 am
- Contact:
Re: Linux Agent backing up more data than used?
Hi,
As far as I can tell yes - I deleted the Backup and decided to run another machine on a slower link (since this is the worst case link - it needs to work on that link) - I can't test it atm.
As i've edited I'm seeing something similar with a WAY worse connection. Almost the same sda1 and sda2 (since same servers installed from same media/image) - used space is ~147MB, but the Agent transfers ~415MB (which is a HUGE difference considering I'm doing the Backup at 500kb/s (not KiloByte - I'm talking about 500 kilobit a second ) - which results in a 480MB .vbk File on the Repo Server. That's almost 3x the used space on these volumes?!
Thanks!
Edit:
Edit2:
As stated in the other Thread - VAL can only skip XFS and ext4 unused blocks. So that's something I did miss - and that results in the larger backup for sda volumes. Thank!
As far as I can tell yes - I deleted the Backup and decided to run another machine on a slower link (since this is the worst case link - it needs to work on that link) - I can't test it atm.
As i've edited I'm seeing something similar with a WAY worse connection. Almost the same sda1 and sda2 (since same servers installed from same media/image) - used space is ~147MB, but the Agent transfers ~415MB (which is a HUGE difference considering I'm doing the Backup at 500kb/s (not KiloByte - I'm talking about 500 kilobit a second ) - which results in a 480MB .vbk File on the Repo Server. That's almost 3x the used space on these volumes?!
Thanks!
Edit:
Edit2:
As stated in the other Thread - VAL can only skip XFS and ext4 unused blocks. So that's something I did miss - and that results in the larger backup for sda volumes. Thank!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests