-
- Service Provider
- Posts: 233
- Liked: 19 times
- Joined: Mar 29, 2016 3:37 pm
- Full Name: Matt Sharpe
- Contact:
VO365 Backup Copy Repository Limitations
Can anyone confirm why Veeam have restricted the backup copy target(s) to archive tier object storage only?
"You can use only backup repositories extended with the Azure Blob Storage Archive access tier, Amazon S3 Glacier or Amazon S3 Glacier Deep Archive storage as a target for backup copy jobs."
Doesn't make sense considering the access method is the same... something in the backend or way it stores the structure that's different?
"You can use only backup repositories extended with the Azure Blob Storage Archive access tier, Amazon S3 Glacier or Amazon S3 Glacier Deep Archive storage as a target for backup copy jobs."
Doesn't make sense considering the access method is the same... something in the backend or way it stores the structure that's different?
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 14839
- Liked: 3086 times
- Joined: Sep 01, 2014 11:46 am
- Full Name: Hannes Kasparick
- Location: Austria
- Contact:
Re: VO365 Backup Copy Repository Limitations
Hello,
the tiers are different from a cost model. So we treat them differently. Same protocol though, but different mechanisms in the background.
The goal is to save costs for customers. Glacier / Azure archive are the cheapest option to achieve that goal.
Best regards,
Hannes
the tiers are different from a cost model. So we treat them differently. Same protocol though, but different mechanisms in the background.
The goal is to save costs for customers. Glacier / Azure archive are the cheapest option to achieve that goal.
Best regards,
Hannes
-
- Service Provider
- Posts: 233
- Liked: 19 times
- Joined: Mar 29, 2016 3:37 pm
- Full Name: Matt Sharpe
- Contact:
Re: VO365 Backup Copy Repository Limitations
That's fine for wanting to save customers money, however what about customers or providers that want to utilize their own object storage. You should make it available for people to have the option of what object storage to use and not restrict/force them down the public cloud archive storage route.
Some companies don't want to use public cloud, but this feature is forcing their hand...
Some companies don't want to use public cloud, but this feature is forcing their hand...
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 745
- Liked: 191 times
- Joined: Nov 01, 2016 11:26 am
- Contact:
Re: VO365 Backup Copy Repository Limitations
Hello Matt,
Unfortunately, we cannot share any ETA, but it's planned for future versions to support additional types of object storage.
Thanks
Unfortunately, we cannot share any ETA, but it's planned for future versions to support additional types of object storage.
Thanks
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 14839
- Liked: 3086 times
- Joined: Sep 01, 2014 11:46 am
- Full Name: Hannes Kasparick
- Location: Austria
- Contact:
Re: VO365 Backup Copy Repository Limitations
so it is a feature request to support S3 instead of wanting to know why we only support Archive tier / Glacier?
yes, that request makes sense and is answered by my colleague.
yes, that request makes sense and is answered by my colleague.
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 377
- Liked: 86 times
- Joined: Mar 17, 2015 9:50 pm
- Full Name: Aemilianus Kehler
- Contact:
Re: VO365 Backup Copy Repository Limitations
Please support local storage (Block storage).
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 14839
- Liked: 3086 times
- Joined: Sep 01, 2014 11:46 am
- Full Name: Hannes Kasparick
- Location: Austria
- Contact:
Re: VO365 Backup Copy Repository Limitations
block storage / Jet Database does not scale. Object storage is the way to go. Please don't expect any investment in Jet Database / block storage.
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 8191
- Liked: 1322 times
- Joined: Feb 08, 2013 3:08 pm
- Full Name: Mike Resseler
- Location: Belgium
- Contact:
Re: VO365 Backup Copy Repository Limitations
To add to this topic, we are planning/ working on supporting backup copy from ANY object storage to ANY object storage (so even cloud object storage to on-prem S3 or on-prem S3 to cloud and so on...)
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 377
- Liked: 86 times
- Joined: Mar 17, 2015 9:50 pm
- Full Name: Aemilianus Kehler
- Contact:
Re: VO365 Backup Copy Repository Limitations
I'd like to have more of an explanation on what you exactly mean by this.block storage / Jet Database does not scale.
Why can't I just point to my main job, and point to another backup repo right in VB365, just as much as creating a backup copy job in VBR?
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 14839
- Liked: 3086 times
- Joined: Sep 01, 2014 11:46 am
- Full Name: Hannes Kasparick
- Location: Austria
- Contact:
Re: VO365 Backup Copy Repository Limitations
that means, a few hundred users users usually work, but once you scale to thousands of users, the JetDatabase comes to its limits. That's why our focus is object storage.
I heard even from a small customer, that they just installed MinIO on Windows. It saved them disk space and performance (I don't have all details on the implementation, they just told me at an event that they were positively surprised)
I heard even from a small customer, that they just installed MinIO on Windows. It saved them disk space and performance (I don't have all details on the implementation, they just told me at an event that they were positively surprised)
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests