Maintain control of your Microsoft 365 data
Post Reply
Matt.Sharpe
Service Provider
Posts: 233
Liked: 19 times
Joined: Mar 29, 2016 3:37 pm
Full Name: Matt Sharpe
Contact:

VO365 Backup Copy Repository Limitations

Post by Matt.Sharpe »

Can anyone confirm why Veeam have restricted the backup copy target(s) to archive tier object storage only?

"You can use only backup repositories extended with the Azure Blob Storage Archive access tier, Amazon S3 Glacier or Amazon S3 Glacier Deep Archive storage as a target for backup copy jobs."

Doesn't make sense considering the access method is the same... something in the backend or way it stores the structure that's different?
HannesK
Product Manager
Posts: 14839
Liked: 3086 times
Joined: Sep 01, 2014 11:46 am
Full Name: Hannes Kasparick
Location: Austria
Contact:

Re: VO365 Backup Copy Repository Limitations

Post by HannesK »

Hello,
the tiers are different from a cost model. So we treat them differently. Same protocol though, but different mechanisms in the background.

The goal is to save costs for customers. Glacier / Azure archive are the cheapest option to achieve that goal.

Best regards,
Hannes
Matt.Sharpe
Service Provider
Posts: 233
Liked: 19 times
Joined: Mar 29, 2016 3:37 pm
Full Name: Matt Sharpe
Contact:

Re: VO365 Backup Copy Repository Limitations

Post by Matt.Sharpe »

That's fine for wanting to save customers money, however what about customers or providers that want to utilize their own object storage. You should make it available for people to have the option of what object storage to use and not restrict/force them down the public cloud archive storage route.

Some companies don't want to use public cloud, but this feature is forcing their hand...
RomanK
Veeam Software
Posts: 745
Liked: 191 times
Joined: Nov 01, 2016 11:26 am
Contact:

Re: VO365 Backup Copy Repository Limitations

Post by RomanK »

Hello Matt,

Unfortunately, we cannot share any ETA, but it's planned for future versions to support additional types of object storage.

Thanks
HannesK
Product Manager
Posts: 14839
Liked: 3086 times
Joined: Sep 01, 2014 11:46 am
Full Name: Hannes Kasparick
Location: Austria
Contact:

Re: VO365 Backup Copy Repository Limitations

Post by HannesK »

so it is a feature request to support S3 instead of wanting to know why we only support Archive tier / Glacier? :-)

yes, that request makes sense and is answered by my colleague.
Zew
Veteran
Posts: 377
Liked: 86 times
Joined: Mar 17, 2015 9:50 pm
Full Name: Aemilianus Kehler
Contact:

Re: VO365 Backup Copy Repository Limitations

Post by Zew »

Please support local storage (Block storage).
HannesK
Product Manager
Posts: 14839
Liked: 3086 times
Joined: Sep 01, 2014 11:46 am
Full Name: Hannes Kasparick
Location: Austria
Contact:

Re: VO365 Backup Copy Repository Limitations

Post by HannesK »

block storage / Jet Database does not scale. Object storage is the way to go. Please don't expect any investment in Jet Database / block storage.
Mike Resseler
Product Manager
Posts: 8191
Liked: 1322 times
Joined: Feb 08, 2013 3:08 pm
Full Name: Mike Resseler
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Re: VO365 Backup Copy Repository Limitations

Post by Mike Resseler » 2 people like this post

To add to this topic, we are planning/ working on supporting backup copy from ANY object storage to ANY object storage (so even cloud object storage to on-prem S3 or on-prem S3 to cloud and so on...)
Zew
Veteran
Posts: 377
Liked: 86 times
Joined: Mar 17, 2015 9:50 pm
Full Name: Aemilianus Kehler
Contact:

Re: VO365 Backup Copy Repository Limitations

Post by Zew »

block storage / Jet Database does not scale.
I'd like to have more of an explanation on what you exactly mean by this.

Why can't I just point to my main job, and point to another backup repo right in VB365, just as much as creating a backup copy job in VBR?
HannesK
Product Manager
Posts: 14839
Liked: 3086 times
Joined: Sep 01, 2014 11:46 am
Full Name: Hannes Kasparick
Location: Austria
Contact:

Re: VO365 Backup Copy Repository Limitations

Post by HannesK » 2 people like this post

that means, a few hundred users users usually work, but once you scale to thousands of users, the JetDatabase comes to its limits. That's why our focus is object storage.

I heard even from a small customer, that they just installed MinIO on Windows. It saved them disk space and performance (I don't have all details on the implementation, they just told me at an event that they were positively surprised)
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests