Comprehensive data protection for all workloads
Post Reply
orb
Service Provider
Posts: 129
Liked: 27 times
Joined: Apr 01, 2016 5:36 pm
Full Name: Olivier
Contact:

Annoying behavior with Veeam / DirectNFS / Netapp e0M

Post by orb »

Hi,

We noticed a very annoying behaviour of the NetApp integration into the product.

Here is the situation, we have 2 proxy appliances. One does have a dedicated network for NFS access, the other does have only access to the e0M (MGMT interface) of the NetApp.
We discovered NFS permissions are automatically inserted to the /etc/exports (ro + root) if the proxy doesn’t have required access. Since the second proxy doesn’t have access to the NFS network, it finds itself added and connected to the management interface (e0M). This port is not suited for transfers since it does operate at 100Mbits.

They are 2 options to block traffic on the NetApp: options interface.blocked.nfs or interface.blocked.mgmt_data_traffic. Even if they are enabled to refuse connections, they are still added to the NFS exports.

In the meantime, we can only remove the proxy automatic selection to avoid this situation.

Please consider fixing this behaviour by adding a check if the interface is part of the mgmt, and also an option to disable the automatic insert in the /etc/exports. We are using netgroups and it creates quite a mess in our file.

Thank you,
Oli
orb
Service Provider
Posts: 129
Liked: 27 times
Joined: Apr 01, 2016 5:36 pm
Full Name: Olivier
Contact:

Re: Annoying behavior with Veeam / DirectNFS / Netapp e0M

Post by orb »

Case Opened : 01752798
Vitaliy S.
VP, Product Management
Posts: 27377
Liked: 2800 times
Joined: Mar 30, 2009 9:13 am
Full Name: Vitaliy Safarov
Contact:

Re: Annoying behavior with Veeam / DirectNFS / Netapp e0M

Post by Vitaliy S. » 1 person likes this post

Hi Olivier,

Thanks for bringing this to our attention. Currently, the behavior you have described is indeed the expected one, however we are considering having an option that would allow to select which proxy servers can work with the storage. Hope that this should address your concern.

Thanks!
orb
Service Provider
Posts: 129
Liked: 27 times
Joined: Apr 01, 2016 5:36 pm
Full Name: Olivier
Contact:

Re: Annoying behavior with Veeam / DirectNFS / Netapp e0M

Post by orb »

Vitaly,

I would welcome such an option, would not it be better to check if the IP is registered to a Management interface ? Reading the option value might be too restrictive since you would denied the usage of some (or all) protocols for administration purposes.

a registry setting to block exports insertion would be lovely too.

Oli
Vitaliy S.
VP, Product Management
Posts: 27377
Liked: 2800 times
Joined: Mar 30, 2009 9:13 am
Full Name: Vitaliy Safarov
Contact:

Re: Annoying behavior with Veeam / DirectNFS / Netapp e0M

Post by Vitaliy S. »

Yes, other options might be indeed a better choice, but I'm just thinking on the most reliable and easy/quicker (keep in mind both dev and QA time) to deliver solution for your problem. Thanks for the suggestions though.
orb
Service Provider
Posts: 129
Liked: 27 times
Joined: Apr 01, 2016 5:36 pm
Full Name: Olivier
Contact:

Re: Annoying behavior with Veeam / DirectNFS / Netapp e0M

Post by orb »

And hope.it does not break people using the the management port without know it. :)
orb
Service Provider
Posts: 129
Liked: 27 times
Joined: Apr 01, 2016 5:36 pm
Full Name: Olivier
Contact:

Re: Annoying behavior with Veeam / DirectNFS / Netapp e0M

Post by orb »

Vitali,

It strikes to me on Netapp the cli cmd (and not only) exportfs -c IP,[:IP] volume allows to verify the AC against an existing volume. It could be be a way to handle existing netgroups usage and avoid unnecessary inserts.

Oli
Vitaliy S.
VP, Product Management
Posts: 27377
Liked: 2800 times
Joined: Mar 30, 2009 9:13 am
Full Name: Vitaliy Safarov
Contact:

Re: Annoying behavior with Veeam / DirectNFS / Netapp e0M

Post by Vitaliy S. »

Oli, thanks for sharing this. I will give a heads up to our dev team.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 94 guests