Hi all
I am looking to automate a backup going to offsite to one of our remote offices, unfortunately the WAN link isn't great so it will be slow.
I already do various backup copy jobs which go to local storage devices and a USB rotation.
I originally was looking at setting a new job up with reverse incremental however upon doing the initial backup locally then only incremental's it was obviously holding the VM in a backing up state for a good few hours and I was concerned doing this along with the local backup would at some point in the future possible cause me issues and reduce my server reboot windows.
So I was hoping I could do something with the backups stored locally with backup copy jobs rather than on the live VM if I am making sense?
I don't mind setting up a local RI and then a backup copy job off the back of that as it doesn't take too much time doing a local RI but I don't see how that would work as it would already have injected the incremental changes into the full backup so surely the full backup would try to transfer?
Any advice welcome, I am new to Veeam so have limited knowledge.
Cheers
Chris
-
- Influencer
- Posts: 17
- Liked: 1 time
- Joined: Aug 11, 2014 7:44 am
- Full Name: Chris Johnson
- Contact:
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 21138
- Liked: 2141 times
- Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
- Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
- Contact:
Re: Backup Copy Job over slow WAN
This makes total sense, backup copy jobs were designed specifically with this use case in mind.ChrisJ83 wrote:So I was hoping I could do something with the backups stored locally with backup copy jobs rather than on the live VM if I am making sense?
Regardless of the fact that changes are already injected into the full backup file, backup copy job will copy just the changed blocks.ChrisJ83 wrote:I don't mind setting up a local RI and then a backup copy job off the back of that as it doesn't take too much time doing a local RI but I don't see how that would work as it would already have injected the incremental changes into the full backup so surely the full backup would try to transfer?
-
- Influencer
- Posts: 17
- Liked: 1 time
- Joined: Aug 11, 2014 7:44 am
- Full Name: Chris Johnson
- Contact:
Re: Backup Copy Job over slow WAN
Thanks for the reply foggy, really appreciated.
So at present I run an incremental local job which creates synthentic full backups periodically and has a retention period of 31 days then various backup copy jobs off that.
Would I best creating a new job alongside this and setting it to RI and then creating a backup copy job off the back of this to our offsite location?
Or am I better off just setting up a new backup copy job which goes to our offsite location (initial one done locally)? As even though the job will create a synthetic full backup every Saturday it will still only transfer changed blocks on the backup copy job not the new full backup?
Thanks again
Chris
So at present I run an incremental local job which creates synthentic full backups periodically and has a retention period of 31 days then various backup copy jobs off that.
Would I best creating a new job alongside this and setting it to RI and then creating a backup copy job off the back of this to our offsite location?
Or am I better off just setting up a new backup copy job which goes to our offsite location (initial one done locally)? As even though the job will create a synthetic full backup every Saturday it will still only transfer changed blocks on the backup copy job not the new full backup?
Thanks again
Chris
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 21138
- Liked: 2141 times
- Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
- Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
- Contact:
Re: Backup Copy Job over slow WAN
You can go either way, however I do not see why do you need another backup job to achieve what you want. Backup copy job works similarly with either of the backup methods as a source (forward/reverse).
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 118 guests