-
- Lurker
- Posts: 2
- Liked: never
- Joined: Sep 23, 2010 6:16 am
- Full Name: Richard Setford
- Contact:
Backup failure
Hi,
Running Veeam Backup 4.1 and I'm getting this error shortly after the job starts:
'All instances of the storage metadata are corrupted.'
What do I need to do to clear this and get my backups running again?
Thanks,
Richard
Running Veeam Backup 4.1 and I'm getting this error shortly after the job starts:
'All instances of the storage metadata are corrupted.'
What do I need to do to clear this and get my backups running again?
Thanks,
Richard
-
- Chief Product Officer
- Posts: 31795
- Liked: 7297 times
- Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Baar, Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: Backup failure
Hi Richard, you should re-create your backup job. Thanks!
-
- Lurker
- Posts: 2
- Liked: never
- Joined: Sep 23, 2010 6:16 am
- Full Name: Richard Setford
- Contact:
Re: Backup failure
Thanks Anton.
Out of interest, do you know what causes this problem?
I've just updated from 4.1 to 4.1.2 in case that helps.
Out of interest, do you know what causes this problem?
I've just updated from 4.1 to 4.1.2 in case that helps.
-
- VP, Product Management
- Posts: 27368
- Liked: 2799 times
- Joined: Mar 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Full Name: Vitaliy Safarov
- Contact:
Re: Backup failure
Richard, we should be able tell you more if you send all the product log files to our technical team. Basically, it seems like there was some kind of a target storage problem.
-
- Chief Product Officer
- Posts: 31795
- Liked: 7297 times
- Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Baar, Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: Backup failure
Richard, are you backing up to a NAS (network share) or locally?
Does this storage use RAID? Did you perform RAID rebuild recently?
Does this storage use RAID? Did you perform RAID rebuild recently?
-
- Lurker
- Posts: 2
- Liked: never
- Joined: Feb 03, 2011 9:00 pm
- Full Name: justin keiser
Re: Backup failure
so basically what you're saying is that this backup messed up so we should start over and we're on our own? seems to happen too often. garbage.
-
- Chief Product Officer
- Posts: 31795
- Liked: 7297 times
- Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Baar, Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: Backup failure
Hi Justin, no we never said anything like this. We were actually responding to Richard above.jkeiser wrote:so basically what you're saying is that this backup messed up so we should start over and we're on our own?
What issue are you experiencing, the same error? What is your support case number?
-
- Veeam ProPartner
- Posts: 45
- Liked: never
- Joined: Feb 16, 2011 9:10 am
- Full Name: David Molina
- Location: Valencia, Spain
- Contact:
Re: Backup failure
Hello,
I have the same issue. Is there any option different to rebuild the jobs?
My support ticket is ID#5176860.
Regards,
I have the same issue. Is there any option different to rebuild the jobs?
My support ticket is ID#5176860.
Regards,
-
- Chief Product Officer
- Posts: 31795
- Liked: 7297 times
- Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Baar, Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: Backup failure
Wow, you have bumped a really old thread with that post... these kind of issues certainly do not happen very often.
Basically, this error means incredible corruption of the backup file... there is a perfect army term for that condition, FUBAR. You don't have to rebuild the job, but you most definitely need to initiate active full backup in that job. And prior to that, I would recommend changing the backup repository in the job settings to the one located on a different storage, because these kind of issues can only be caused by very bad underlying storage issues.
Thanks!
Basically, this error means incredible corruption of the backup file... there is a perfect army term for that condition, FUBAR. You don't have to rebuild the job, but you most definitely need to initiate active full backup in that job. And prior to that, I would recommend changing the backup repository in the job settings to the one located on a different storage, because these kind of issues can only be caused by very bad underlying storage issues.
Thanks!
-
- Novice
- Posts: 4
- Liked: never
- Joined: Mar 04, 2013 10:58 pm
- Full Name: Genachka
- Contact:
Re: Backup failure
Gostev,
I know this thread is really old, and it was bumped by someone once before, but I can't seem to escape this problem.
I've now tried for several months at a time one each version of Veeam going back to 5.0 (and have tried on 6, 6.1, and now on 6.5). I've applied patches, including now on 6.5 patch #1. But after about a month or two of backups I am back to getting the error: "Error: Client error: All instances of the storage metadat are corrupted.
Veeam is running on a physical Windows 7 64bit workstation that has 8GB RAM, i7 2.8GHz quad core. The OS and Veeam are on different disk from the destination storage. The backup destination is a local dedicated disk (7200 RPM Sata III) that is 3TB, with 1.5TB free. The backup source is currently Esxi 5 (have also tried in the past with Esxi 4 with same issues). When Veeam successfully backed up, it reported that it transferred 28GB and Read 90GB. So there is plenty of space. The backup is set to run on Monday, Wednesday, Friday and Saturday. It is configured as incremental with a synthetic full created on Wednesday and is set to transform previous full backup chains into rollbacks.
After getting the corrupt issue, it obviously no longer is able to make a backup and I've ended up recreating the job each time. What is going on? It seems that it's not a reliable backup solution. Please help!
I know this thread is really old, and it was bumped by someone once before, but I can't seem to escape this problem.
I've now tried for several months at a time one each version of Veeam going back to 5.0 (and have tried on 6, 6.1, and now on 6.5). I've applied patches, including now on 6.5 patch #1. But after about a month or two of backups I am back to getting the error: "Error: Client error: All instances of the storage metadat are corrupted.
Veeam is running on a physical Windows 7 64bit workstation that has 8GB RAM, i7 2.8GHz quad core. The OS and Veeam are on different disk from the destination storage. The backup destination is a local dedicated disk (7200 RPM Sata III) that is 3TB, with 1.5TB free. The backup source is currently Esxi 5 (have also tried in the past with Esxi 4 with same issues). When Veeam successfully backed up, it reported that it transferred 28GB and Read 90GB. So there is plenty of space. The backup is set to run on Monday, Wednesday, Friday and Saturday. It is configured as incremental with a synthetic full created on Wednesday and is set to transform previous full backup chains into rollbacks.
After getting the corrupt issue, it obviously no longer is able to make a backup and I've ended up recreating the job each time. What is going on? It seems that it's not a reliable backup solution. Please help!
-
- VP, Product Management
- Posts: 27368
- Liked: 2799 times
- Joined: Mar 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Full Name: Vitaliy Safarov
- Contact:
Re: Backup failure
Hello, please include support case ID when posting about any technical issue, as requested when you click New Topic. Thanks!
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 21138
- Liked: 2141 times
- Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
- Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
- Contact:
Re: Backup failure
From my perspective, as this error persists irrespective of the Veeam B&R version and the same storage for backups was used with every version you tried, then the issue indeed is the storage itself. You could try another storage, as it is advised above, to check this.genachka wrote:I've now tried for several months at a time one each version of Veeam going back to 5.0 (and have tried on 6, 6.1, and now on 6.5). I've applied patches, including now on 6.5 patch #1. But after about a month or two of backups I am back to getting the error: "Error: Client error: All instances of the storage metadat are corrupted.
You do not need to recreate the job every time, it should be sufficient to perform an active full instead (this will start the whole backup chain anew reading the entire VM data from source).genachka wrote:After getting the corrupt issue, it obviously no longer is able to make a backup and I've ended up recreating the job each time.
-
- Novice
- Posts: 4
- Liked: never
- Joined: Mar 04, 2013 10:58 pm
- Full Name: Genachka
- Contact:
Re: Backup failure
I've tried other backup solutions which do not have this problem with the same storage. That rules out the storage from my perspective.foggy wrote: From my perspective, as this error persists irrespective of the Veeam B&R version and the same storage for backups was used with every version you tried, then the issue indeed is the storage itself. You could try another storage, as it is advised above, to check this.
If I already have a full backup set to scheduled as part of the job every Wednesday, shouldn't it automatically have corrected itself?foggy wrote:After getting the corrupt issue, it obviously no longer is able to make a backup and I've ended up recreating the job each time.
You do not need to recreate the job every time, it should be sufficient to perform an active full instead (this will start the whole backup chain anew reading the entire VM data from source).
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 21138
- Liked: 2141 times
- Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
- Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
- Contact:
Re: Backup failure
As I can see from your first post, this is a synthetic full (that consolidates previous full backup and a chain of increments into a new full backup), not an active one that grabs the data from the source storage. Synthetic full takes data from the files that you already have on the backup repository - and they are corrupt.genachka wrote:If I already have a full backup set to scheduled as part of the job every Wednesday, shouldn't it automatically have corrected itself?
-
- Lurker
- Posts: 1
- Liked: never
- Joined: Mar 05, 2013 5:46 am
- Full Name: Florence Moran
- Contact:
Re: Backup failure
i am getting the same error message and tried each and every suggestion here but nothing worked ,any one else ?
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 21138
- Liked: 2141 times
- Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
- Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
- Contact:
Re: Backup failure
Florence, have you already contacted support team with debug logs for your jobs? Actually the first step to perform when getting any technical issue.
-
- Novice
- Posts: 4
- Liked: never
- Joined: Mar 04, 2013 10:58 pm
- Full Name: Genachka
- Contact:
Re: Backup failure
Ah, ok that makes sense. So I guess there's no need to have an active full scheduled (not sure if that's even possible?) unless there is a corruption?foggy wrote:As I can see from your first post, this is a synthetic full (that consolidates previous full backup and a chain of increments into a new full backup), not an active one that grabs the data from the source storage. Synthetic full takes data from the files that you already have on the backup repository - and they are corrupt.
Also, what happens in this case... If I had a backup job set with the synthetic full and incremental with 14 days of rention and after a month it gets corrupted but I leave it running as it for 2 weeks. When I do an active full now, does it automatically delete the previous healthy set and remove the corrupted items? Do they say behind and need manual clean up? If for two weeks it was complaining that it's corrupt, does it override the previous good?
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 21138
- Liked: 2141 times
- Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
- Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
- Contact:
Re: Backup failure
Our best practices recommended to perform active full on monthly basis. And that also takes the possibility of corruption into account.genachka wrote:So I guess there's no need to have an active full scheduled (not sure if that's even possible?) unless there is a corruption?
Retention policy is applied at the end of the successful job run only. So you will always have the specified amount of good restore points available (even if you have months of failing backups). Active full will start the new chain and older restore points will be deleted according to the retention settings.genachka wrote:Also, what happens in this case... If I had a backup job set with the synthetic full and incremental with 14 days of rention and after a month it gets corrupted but I leave it running as it for 2 weeks. When I do an active full now, does it automatically delete the previous healthy set and remove the corrupted items? Do they say behind and need manual clean up? If for two weeks it was complaining that it's corrupt, does it override the previous good?
-
- Novice
- Posts: 4
- Liked: never
- Joined: Mar 04, 2013 10:58 pm
- Full Name: Genachka
- Contact:
Re: Backup failure
It's now been a couple of months that I've followed the recommendations and the backup was running fine until the past month. It started to fail again. The error I'm getting is:foggy wrote: As I can see from your first post, this is a synthetic full (that consolidates previous full backup and a chain of increments into a new full backup), not an active one that grabs the data from the source storage. Synthetic full takes data from the files that you already have on the backup repository - and they are corrupt.
Code: Select all
Failed to delete oib '[vmname=<vm name deleted>:creation_time=5/11/2013 1:54:39 AM:alg=Transform:id=d7dfe363-f467-49ad-ad14-d5a76db6653e:point_id=d7457ff2-1978-4a50-bdf2-925298c95605:storage_id=be4aa1d4-a3fb-41f3-a44d-40eba5b81dda]' from 'V:\Veeam Backups\192.168.x.xxx\Weekly - Full - Backup of 192.168.x.xxx vSphere 5\Weekly - Full - Backup of 192.168.x.xxx vSphere 5.02013-05-11T010436.vbk', redo 'V:\Veeam Backups\192.168.x.xxx\Weekly - Full - Backup of 192.168.x
I do have a active full scheduled each wednesday.
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 21138
- Liked: 2141 times
- Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
- Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
- Contact:
Re: Backup failure
Is there a chance that you run out of the disk space on the target repository? Anyway, please contact our support team directly as it is advised when you have any kind of technical issue. Thanks.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Gostev, ssimakov and 152 guests