Comprehensive data protection for all workloads
Post Reply
MGatWG
Lurker
Posts: 1
Liked: never
Joined: May 12, 2021 2:02 pm
Full Name: MG
Contact:

Copy to cloud without redundant storage and processing?

Post by MGatWG »

I've tried to work this out with Veeam support a couple times, but seem to keep running into issues. I'm using a new Veeam 11 installation of Veeam Backup & Replication.

The basics are this:
  • I have 3 Windows Agent Backup jobs that backup unique folders to a NAS device from 3 servers (Srv1 - Srv3).
  • I have a Windows Backup Copy job ('FilesToCloud') that uses those 3 jobs as 'Objects' and backs up to a Scale Out Repository (SOBR) for my cloud.
  • I want to keep 6 months of full backups on my NAS, and 12 months + 5 annuals on my cloud (configured with GFS on jobs)
This all seems to be working, with one issue: It looks like the single Windows Backup Copy job (using SOBR) is actually re-running the 3 Windows Agents Backups. I see full backup (VBK) files on my NAS here with different times and sizes:
\\NAS\Srv1 Files\Srv1
\\NAS\FilesToCloud\Srv1_Files\Srv1

I would think that since the Windows Backup Copy job was configured to use the 3 Windows Agent Backup jobs that it would have used the results from those jobs, and not re-run them.

Question: How do I eliminate this redundant storage and processing time?

You may wonder:
Why do I have 3 file backup jobs? Because each server has unique folders to backup, and I prefer not to receive warnings about missing folders when I put all 3 in a single job.
Why am I backing up folders, not volumes? Because the volumes have terabytes of static data backed up elsewhere and the actual dynamic data is small.
Why do I have a Backup Copy job, why not backup files to SOBR? Because Veeam said to do so since I wanted different GFS lengths on NAS vs. Cloud.

Thanks in advance for any suggestions.
veremin
Product Manager
Posts: 20400
Liked: 2298 times
Joined: Oct 26, 2012 3:28 pm
Full Name: Vladimir Eremin
Contact:

Re: Copy to cloud without redundant storage and processing?

Post by veremin »

Looks unexpected, a backup copy job should not re-run source jobs, instead it should wait and copy the resulting restore points those jobs created. So we'd appreciated, if you share a support ticket with us so we can investigate the issue further. Thanks!
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: andreilight1, Google [Bot], Ivan239, MarioZ, ThomasIKL51, veremin and 160 guests