-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 65
- Liked: 20 times
- Joined: Jun 27, 2011 7:39 pm
- Full Name: Matt Crape
- Contact:
Feature Request: Bitlooker for Replication
Hi there - it would be awesome if we could exclude directories for replication jobs. I'm sure a lot of folks have something like a c:\temp directory that grows with SQL Backups, downloads, etc. Stuff that we likely don't need replicated. I'm not sure, but does the replication job currently skip files such as the memory dumps, paging, and hibernation files (if they exist)?
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 2097
- Liked: 310 times
- Joined: Nov 17, 2015 2:38 am
- Full Name: Joe Marton
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Contact:
Re: Feature Request: Bitlooker for Replication
As another way to think about it, why not use BitLooker to exclude those folders from the backup, then in the properties of the replication job specify backup files rather than production storage as the source?
Joe
Joe
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 6551
- Liked: 765 times
- Joined: May 19, 2015 1:46 pm
- Contact:
Re: Feature Request: Bitlooker for Replication
In case you wanted your replication to occur evey X minutes that approach would require you to backup your VM every X minutes, which is not very convenient I believe.As another way to think about it, why not use BitLooker to exclude those folders from the backup, then in the properties of the replication job specify backup files rather than production storage as the source?
Yes, there is an option to exclude swap file blocks and deleted file blocks in "Advanced Settings". Please see this article for more info.but does the replication job currently skip files such as the memory dumps, paging, and hibernation files (if they exist)?
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 65
- Liked: 20 times
- Joined: Jun 27, 2011 7:39 pm
- Full Name: Matt Crape
- Contact:
Re: Feature Request: Bitlooker for Replication
With regards to the first point, yes, exactly - my replication jobs aren't built from backups. In some instances I may have a replication job for a VM that is not backed up (odd, I know).
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 14835
- Liked: 3082 times
- Joined: Sep 01, 2014 11:46 am
- Full Name: Hannes Kasparick
- Location: Austria
- Contact:
Re: Feature Request: Bitlooker for Replication
+1 for Bitlooker for replication
-
- Chief Product Officer
- Posts: 31798
- Liked: 7297 times
- Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Baar, Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: Feature Request: Bitlooker for Replication
@Hannes but we have it already?
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 14835
- Liked: 3082 times
- Joined: Sep 01, 2014 11:46 am
- Full Name: Hannes Kasparick
- Location: Austria
- Contact:
Re: Feature Request: Bitlooker for Replication
my fault... I was missing "exclude deleted file blocks" but I simply did not read correct... forget my request, thanks
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 20389
- Liked: 2298 times
- Joined: Oct 26, 2012 3:28 pm
- Full Name: Vladimir Eremin
- Contact:
Re: Feature Request: Bitlooker for Replication
Exclude deleted file blocks functionality is also there. Thanks.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 171 guests