Comprehensive data protection for all workloads
Post Reply
Dytech
Novice
Posts: 4
Liked: 1 time
Joined: Jul 23, 2018 8:08 am
Contact:

Feature Request:Fill "LAST RESULT" field for continuous jobs

Post by Dytech » 1 person likes this post

Hello,

we are checking the "Last Result" with Powershell to monitor if a Backup Copy Job Completed successfully. That works for normal jobs, but on a "Copy Job" the "Last Result" field is only filled, while the Job is deaktivated. As soon its enabled, the last result status is gone and we can't check it.

Also, it would be nice to it directly in the Gui at the Copy Job that something is wrong with the job, at the moment the job look great, even if its not working.
Image


We already talked to support and as a workaround we, are deaktivating the job, then start the check and then reaktivate it. That is working, but now we get new History events every time a check is executed. This spams our history log.

Best Regards,
Rafael
Gostev
Chief Product Officer
Posts: 31816
Liked: 7302 times
Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
Location: Baar, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Feature Request:Fill "LAST RESULT" field for continuous

Post by Gostev »

Hi, we'll take a look why it is not set. Thanks!
billcouper
Service Provider
Posts: 153
Liked: 34 times
Joined: Dec 18, 2017 8:58 am
Full Name: Bill Couper
Contact:

Re: Feature Request:Fill "LAST RESULT" field for continuous

Post by billcouper »

+1 to this, have same issue, already raised a support ticket in the past and it couldn't be solved.
last result only shows for jobs that are not running. but continuous backup copies are continuous :)
Vek17
Service Provider
Posts: 49
Liked: 15 times
Joined: May 29, 2018 8:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Feature Request:Fill "LAST RESULT" field for continuous

Post by Vek17 »

Definitely worth adding. Visibility for backup copies is relatively poor.
Mgamerz
Expert
Posts: 160
Liked: 28 times
Joined: Sep 29, 2017 8:07 pm
Contact:

Re: Feature Request:Fill "LAST RESULT" field for continuous

Post by Mgamerz »

Same issue here, I thought this was by design, though I thought it was pretty poor design.
veremin
Product Manager
Posts: 20415
Liked: 2302 times
Joined: Oct 26, 2012 3:28 pm
Full Name: Vladimir Eremin
Contact:

Re: Feature Request:Fill "LAST RESULT" field for continuous

Post by veremin » 1 person likes this post

We discussed this enhancement internally - the results were positive. So, there is a chance that the corresponding field (for bcj) will be added in the next product update. Thanks.
Dytech
Novice
Posts: 4
Liked: 1 time
Joined: Jul 23, 2018 8:08 am
Contact:

Re: Feature Request:Fill "LAST RESULT" field for continuous jobs

Post by Dytech »

Hello All.

any News on this ?

Best Regards
foggy
Veeam Software
Posts: 21139
Liked: 2141 times
Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
Contact:

Re: Feature Request:Fill "LAST RESULT" field for continuous jobs

Post by foggy » 1 person likes this post

This is included in U4.
Dytech
Novice
Posts: 4
Liked: 1 time
Joined: Jul 23, 2018 8:08 am
Contact:

Re: Feature Request:Fill "LAST RESULT" field for continuous jobs

Post by Dytech »

Thanks a lot !

any news when U4 is coming out ?
Dima P.
Product Manager
Posts: 14726
Liked: 1707 times
Joined: Feb 04, 2013 2:07 pm
Full Name: Dmitry Popov
Location: Prague
Contact:

Re: Feature Request:Fill "LAST RESULT" field for continuous jobs

Post by Dima P. » 1 person likes this post

Dytech,

The plan is to make Update 4 generally available on January 22nd. Cheers!
Gostev wrote:The biggest news today is actually old news from 2018, but something many of you have really been waiting for: we did ship the RTM build of long-awaited Update 4 for Veeam Backup & Replication 9.5, as well as Veeam Agents 3.0 before the end of last year - on December 28th. Kudos to our amazing R&D for all their hard work in the last weeks of the year! It is certainly the biggest release in the history of Veeam – not only by the sheer number of new features (and lines of code), but also by the number of new innovations. The best place to learn about all of them will be at the live launch web cast, currently planned on January 22nd - which is also when we're aiming to make all new releases generally available (GA).
Gostev
Chief Product Officer
Posts: 31816
Liked: 7302 times
Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
Location: Baar, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Feature Request:Fill "LAST RESULT" field for continuous jobs

Post by Gostev »

Having said that, you can get it through support already, in case you want to be a part of pilot deployments.
Dytech
Novice
Posts: 4
Liked: 1 time
Joined: Jul 23, 2018 8:08 am
Contact:

Re: Feature Request:Fill "LAST RESULT" field for continuous jobs

Post by Dytech »

Thanks for Your info, i will do that next time.

So, I have tested the new build and in the gui its looking good, but with Powershell its still not working, and thats the important part for monitoring.

$job = get-vbrjob -name "BackupSyncJob"
$job.GetLastResult() still returns "None". I still need to disable the Job to get the last result.

Best Regards.
veremin
Product Manager
Posts: 20415
Liked: 2302 times
Joined: Oct 26, 2012 3:28 pm
Full Name: Vladimir Eremin
Contact:

Re: Feature Request:Fill "LAST RESULT" field for continuous jobs

Post by veremin » 1 person likes this post

Try the following the example and see whether there is something you're after:

Code: Select all

Asnp VeeamPSSnapin
$Job = Get-VBRJob -name "Name of your backup job"
$Job.Info.LatestStatus
Thanks!
billcouper
Service Provider
Posts: 153
Liked: 34 times
Joined: Dec 18, 2017 8:58 am
Full Name: Bill Couper
Contact:

Re: Feature Request:Fill "LAST RESULT" field for continuous jobs

Post by billcouper » 1 person likes this post

Another way is to specifically look for job failures.

Code: Select all

Asnp VeeamPSSnapin
$Job = Get-VBRJob -Name "Job Name"
$Session = $job.FindLastSession()
if ($session.Info.Failures -gt 0) {
  # Do something with the failures, eg pull the error text out of them
} else {
  # The job was successful
}
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], G_Mellor, Google [Bot] and 68 guests