-
- Veteran
- Posts: 600
- Liked: 66 times
- Joined: Jun 13, 2013 10:08 am
- Full Name: Paul Kelly
- Contact:
Feature Request: Job-type-specific "Running" indicator
Although it's useful seeing the "Running (x)" information in the left pane, I feel that it would also be useful to know what job-type is still running so that, instead of clicking on the "Running (x)" item in the tree, finding which job is running, then navigating again back to whichever job type it is to look at anything other than basic statistics, it would be useful if somehow we could tell which type of job was running & just go straight there instead?
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 6551
- Liked: 765 times
- Joined: May 19, 2015 1:46 pm
- Contact:
Re: Feature Request: Job-type-specific "Running" indicator
Hi,
Sounds good. will it be ebough to display the first letter of job type, for example "T" for tape job, or "C" for backup copy job, "R" for replica (Running (B,T), Running (C,R)) and so on?
Thanks
Sounds good. will it be ebough to display the first letter of job type, for example "T" for tape job, or "C" for backup copy job, "R" for replica (Running (B,T), Running (C,R)) and so on?
Thanks
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 600
- Liked: 66 times
- Joined: Jun 13, 2013 10:08 am
- Full Name: Paul Kelly
- Contact:
Re: Feature Request: Job-type-specific "Running" indicator
Anything would be better than current method, but I guess it depends where you put them. I can imagine something like "Running (2T, 1C, 1R) getting hidden whereas perhaps:
Backup (1)
SureBackup
Replication (1)
Tape (2)
Might be a better way of presenting the info? (i.e. no SureBackupjob running so no bracketed number beside it)
Backup (1)
SureBackup
Replication (1)
Tape (2)
Might be a better way of presenting the info? (i.e. no SureBackupjob running so no bracketed number beside it)
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 69 guests