The following feature requests and/or bug fixes are maybe already on the roadmap for the next minor/major release.
- more granual job scheduling:
full backups at a different start time than incrementals because they take longer
full backup able to select specific dates not only day of the week and/or in which week
- when selecting VM's to backup in the backup job it would be nice to show VM's that are already in the same or other other job with a different color or in italic
- when changing which VM disks to backup in a job it does not properly update the total backup size, sometimes I just stays on the old value or sometimes only a few KB (yes I click on the recalculate button but didn't help)
- if somehow possible improve backup speed when doing full backup with compression (see this thread: http://www.veeam.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=6923 )
Improving replication speed and adding/changing replication methods is already on the roadmap for the next major release as far as I'v heard.
Thanks.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 85
- Liked: never
- Joined: Mar 03, 2011 4:48 pm
- Full Name: Enrico
- Contact:
-
- Chief Product Officer
- Posts: 31814
- Liked: 7302 times
- Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Baar, Switzerland
- Contact:
Re: Feature Requests bug fixes
Thanks for your feedback, the above features definitely make sense and some have been requested before. This does not mean I agree that our engine needs improvements around doing full backup with compression.
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 387
- Liked: 97 times
- Joined: Mar 24, 2010 5:47 pm
- Full Name: Larry Walker
- Contact:
Re: Feature Requests bug fixes
I want a job thats backs up and replicats a vm at the same time over a WAN. The same CB appiled to both Now I nust run two jobs eating by WAN bandwidth
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 85
- Liked: never
- Joined: Mar 03, 2011 4:48 pm
- Full Name: Enrico
- Contact:
Re: Feature Requests bug fixes
Also I'd like to able to configure the compression/dedupe/storage settings for full backup different than for incremental backups. Because for full backups it is more important to get them done faster (with lower/none compression) even if costs you maybe 30% more disk space but the incrementals are already fast because you transfer only the changes so high compression would be better there to save disk space.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 85 guests