Strategy advice needed:
I have a job where Replication from Backup was chosen as the Replication source. The Backup Repository (source for Replicas) is "remote" on the far side of a VPN from the actual *_replica VMs. There is a desired RPO of 1-3 Hours.
Now here's the problem: In order for a replica to be useful, the backup has to run as/more frequently than the replica RPO. So to attain 1-3 Hours RPO, unless we do Forever Forward Incremental, there are too many restore points (168) between full/synthetic full backups. Also, the synthetic full is proving to be disruptive, taking more than 18 hours.
How about forever forward with a retenmtion policy of 24 and an hourly backup cycle, plus a Backup Copy job to keep a weekly full and any GFS policy we like?
Then we could source the *_replica from the forever forward job and attain 1-hour RPO!
Opinions?
THX!
-
- Service Provider
- Posts: 234
- Liked: 40 times
- Joined: Mar 08, 2010 4:05 pm
- Full Name: John Borhek
- Contact:
Forever Forward plus Backup Copy
John Borhek, Solutions Architect
https://vmsources.com
https://vmsources.com
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 7328
- Liked: 781 times
- Joined: May 21, 2014 11:03 am
- Full Name: Nikita Shestakov
- Location: Prague
- Contact:
Re: Forever Forward plus Backup Copy
Hello John,
Your plan sounds good.
Another idea is to have 2 sets of backup/backup copy jobs taking turns.
Your plan sounds good.
Another idea is to have 2 sets of backup/backup copy jobs taking turns.
-
- Service Provider
- Posts: 234
- Liked: 40 times
- Joined: Mar 08, 2010 4:05 pm
- Full Name: John Borhek
- Contact:
Re: Forever Forward plus Backup Copy
Follow up:
Using Forever Forward, theoretically the Full Backup (*.vbk) is being "injected" each time a Retention Policy is applied.
We have seen a Replication job where the replication is cancelled by the Backup job it sources.
Could this be because the *.vbk is being grabbed from the Replication job by the Backup Job?
BTW: Replication was working until the Forever Forward job reached saturation and began applying Retention policy?
Using Forever Forward, theoretically the Full Backup (*.vbk) is being "injected" each time a Retention Policy is applied.
We have seen a Replication job where the replication is cancelled by the Backup job it sources.
Could this be because the *.vbk is being grabbed from the Replication job by the Backup Job?
BTW: Replication was working until the Forever Forward job reached saturation and began applying Retention policy?
John Borhek, Solutions Architect
https://vmsources.com
https://vmsources.com
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 7328
- Liked: 781 times
- Joined: May 21, 2014 11:03 am
- Full Name: Nikita Shestakov
- Location: Prague
- Contact:
Re: Forever Forward plus Backup Copy
Forever Forward chain merges .vbk and the oldest .vib while replica from backup works with the latest(newest) increments.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 80 guests