- Posts: 148
- Liked: 11 times
- Joined: Aug 20, 2013 1:16 pm
- Full Name: Roger Dufour
Veeam can utilize a tape drive attached they currently use for Backup Exec restoration of older images (yes, we replaced BE with Veeam B&R).
- Least expensive as the technology is on site.
- Prone to media failure in the long term, support for old technology will require the data be refreshed periodically (manual intervention and actions for eacn refresh cycle)
Veeam can manage cloud storage as a Backup Copy target
- Monthly charges to keep data offsite
- SLA guarantees for data storage, availability and offsite backup
- Depending on vendor, this can be costly
Purchase more storage for “archive” requirements. Change tertiary copy retention to forever
- Disk is expensive to maintain onsite, cost for initial purchase, ongoing costs for electricity and cooling, limited space unless more space is purchased
As we will be discussing this with the client, and their legal requirement is to have the data available forever, can you think of any other methodologies, and what (in your opinion) are the strengths and limitations?
- Product Manager
- Posts: 17005
- Liked: 1455 times
- Joined: Oct 26, 2012 3:28 pm
- Full Name: Vladimir Eremin
Personally I'd choose between tapes and cloud as means of "endless" protection.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 10 guests