jim3cantos wrote:It should be good to have an option for writing the VIB incremental data directly into the VBK full like local backup jobs (in fact I think that sometimes it really does the merge that way, may be when the incremental backup file to merge is small?).
foggy wrote:Could you please elaborate on what requirements do you find to be not practical?
foggy wrote:Not sure I understand this part as well. Do you mean the reverse incremental backup method used in the backup jobs, where the changes are injected directly into the full backup file?
jim3cantos wrote:I refer to the "merge overhead" indicated in the KB when the destination of the backup copy job is a rotated disk
jim3cantos wrote:I think so but in fact we use the incremental (recommended) method for backup jobs. Isn't the situation the same in this case?, i.e. the changes of the oldest incremental backup are injected directly into the full backup file?
Users browsing this forum: baber and 1 guest