Comprehensive data protection for all workloads
Post Reply
JasonPGTF
Enthusiast
Posts: 33
Liked: never
Joined: Sep 19, 2018 1:29 am
Full Name: Jason Oon
Contact:

Identical proxies but different performance.

Post by JasonPGTF »

Hi guys, may I know if anyone know the reason on why 1 proxies is faster then the other? Below is the statistics of 1 of my backup job, as you can see proxy 102 has better read speed compare to proxy 101.

2/11/2020 4:01:53 PM :: Using backup proxy pngveeampxy102 for disk Hard disk 2 [hotadd]
2/11/2020 4:01:53 PM :: Using backup proxy pngveeampxy101.jv.tfme.com for disk Hard disk 3 [hotadd]
2/11/2020 4:01:53 PM :: Using backup proxy pngveeampxy101.jv.tfme.com for disk Hard disk 1 [hotadd]
2/11/2020 4:02:42 PM :: Hard disk 2 (10.0 GB) 191.0 MB read at 109 MB/s [CBT]
2/11/2020 4:02:48 PM :: Hard disk 3 (300.0 GB) 289.0 MB read at 16 MB/s [CBT]
2/11/2020 4:04:15 PM :: Hard disk 1 (200.0 GB) 871.0 MB read at 19 MB/s [CBT]

Both proxy is identical, infact 102 is a clone of 101 & both are a VM servers. From Veeams perspective, I don't see anything different from the settings. Both proxy is having the same subnet as well.
nielsengelen
Product Manager
Posts: 5636
Liked: 1181 times
Joined: Jul 15, 2013 11:09 am
Full Name: Niels Engelen
Contact:

Re: Identical proxies but different performance.

Post by nielsengelen »

From this snippet, it's not really possible to tell. What is the source bottleneck and how is your infrastructure looking like? Most likely you are hitting your network limit which explains this split.
Personal blog: https://foonet.be
GitHub: https://github.com/nielsengelen
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], olafurh and 111 guests