-
- Novice
- Posts: 9
- Liked: never
- Joined: Mar 24, 2010 10:08 am
- Contact:
Linking jobs and disabled ones running after enabling
I find that veeam has an annoying feature when you link jobs.
Lets say you have 6 jobs all linked to start after one another. Job number 1 fails over night so you want to re-run it in the morning.
You disable job 2 so that it doesn't run after. Then you run job 1. It completes fine. However then you reenable job 2. It then kicks off unless you leave it for ages before enabling it.
Anyone else find this annoying? How do you overcome it? Can it be removed?
Lets say you have 6 jobs all linked to start after one another. Job number 1 fails over night so you want to re-run it in the morning.
You disable job 2 so that it doesn't run after. Then you run job 1. It completes fine. However then you reenable job 2. It then kicks off unless you leave it for ages before enabling it.
Anyone else find this annoying? How do you overcome it? Can it be removed?
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 20413
- Liked: 2301 times
- Joined: Oct 26, 2012 3:28 pm
- Full Name: Vladimir Eremin
- Contact:
Re: Linking jobs and disabled ones running after enabling
Therefore, in case of 6.5 version, it’s always recommended to use 1 as number of maximum concurrent tasks that proxy/repository can handle and staging the job (scheduling them to run with 5 minutes interval). This way, the repository/proxy is limited to one task at a time, and the other jobs will just queue up and, then, be processed once the first one is finished. Thanks.
-
- Novice
- Posts: 9
- Liked: never
- Joined: Mar 24, 2010 10:08 am
- Contact:
Re: Linking jobs and disabled ones running after enabling
Ah so your saying that Job 1 should start at 9pm, then then next 9:05pm, next 9:10pm etc rather than linking the jobs to be run after the 1st is complete?
-
- Product Manager
- Posts: 20413
- Liked: 2301 times
- Joined: Oct 26, 2012 3:28 pm
- Full Name: Vladimir Eremin
- Contact:
Re: Linking jobs and disabled ones running after enabling
Yep, in case of 6.5 version, it’s advisable to use number of concurrent tasks and staging schedule, instead of linking. In this case, you will avoid problems related to linking, such as inability to run just one job, etc. Thanks.
-
- Novice
- Posts: 9
- Liked: never
- Joined: Mar 24, 2010 10:08 am
- Contact:
Re: Linking jobs and disabled ones running after enabling
What about in version 7?
-
- Veeam Software
- Posts: 21139
- Liked: 2141 times
- Joined: Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
- Full Name: Alexander Fogelson
- Contact:
Re: Linking jobs and disabled ones running after enabling
General recommendations of limiting the number of maximum concurrent tasks are still valid for v7. However, you should keep in mind that setting it to 1 will literally disable parallel processing functionality that was introduced in this version. So everything depends on why do you actually need to link jobs at all.
-
- Novice
- Posts: 9
- Liked: never
- Joined: Mar 24, 2010 10:08 am
- Contact:
Re: Linking jobs and disabled ones running after enabling
We dont necessarily need to link them. I thought it was introduced to stop having gaps in between jobs of no activity. I didn't realise that 5 min gaps was an option.
However I will trial setting all the jobs 5 mins apart and see what happens.
Thanks
However I will trial setting all the jobs 5 mins apart and see what happens.
Thanks
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 108 guests