Running Instant Recovery from a dedup device at the DR site is always going to be slower than running it from a normal storage as dedup devices were built that way. How quick would running a replica VM stored on a dedup device differ?
Thanks
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 367
- Liked: 41 times
- Joined: May 15, 2012 2:21 pm
- Full Name: Arun
- Contact:
-
- VeeaMVP
- Posts: 6166
- Liked: 1971 times
- Joined: Jul 26, 2009 3:39 pm
- Full Name: Luca Dell'Oca
- Location: Varese, Italy
- Contact:
Re: Running a replica stored on a dedup appliance
Well, it depends!
Which dedup device are you talking about? If it's using inline dedup it will be slower for sure, if it's post-dedupe usually the last version of every backup is kept in a non-deduped state so it can be run as it would in a normal storage.
Luca.
Which dedup device are you talking about? If it's using inline dedup it will be slower for sure, if it's post-dedupe usually the last version of every backup is kept in a non-deduped state so it can be run as it would in a normal storage.
Luca.
Luca Dell'Oca
Principal EMEA Cloud Architect @ Veeam Software
@dellock6
https://www.virtualtothecore.com/
vExpert 2011 -> 2022
Veeam VMCE #1
Principal EMEA Cloud Architect @ Veeam Software
@dellock6
https://www.virtualtothecore.com/
vExpert 2011 -> 2022
Veeam VMCE #1
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 367
- Liked: 41 times
- Joined: May 15, 2012 2:21 pm
- Full Name: Arun
- Contact:
Re: Running a replica stored on a dedup appliance
I was talking about the Data Domain DD640. How would the performance of the replicas be from this?
-
- Chief Product Officer
- Posts: 31809
- Liked: 7301 times
- Joined: Jan 01, 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Baar, Switzerland
- Contact:
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: AdsBot [Google], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], MSN [Bot] and 301 guests