skumflum wrote:What is the general opinion on this?
Gostev wrote:If you want to guarantee recoverability, you should test your backups - period. There is simply no other way - plus we make it easy to do with SureBackup, so there's no excuse not to do this either.
Look, you are currently concerned about one of like hundred things that can prevent your backups from being recoverable - and I can tell you that CBT bugs is very low on the list of reasons for failed restores that we're seeing in support (and with 250000 customers over 10 years, we have a whole lot of statistics to work with here).
aich365 wrote:What are the advantages of Synthetic Full over Active Full?
Apart from the time difference between Incremental backup and new full backup, the advantage of this seems to be lost in the Synthetic merge process which takes ages on a 3TB File? Typically in excess of 48 hours for a Synthetic and 20 hours for a new Full
skumflum wrote:You don’t see any added value in running active full once a month then?
Users browsing this forum: Regnor and 94 guests