Comprehensive data protection for all workloads
Post Reply
markharford
Influencer
Posts: 12
Liked: 3 times
Joined: Jun 02, 2011 3:33 pm
Full Name: Mark Harford
Contact:

Tidying up Replication Jobs

Post by markharford »

We have a number of replication jobs all of which point to the same target but which we would prefer to run sequentially rather than in parallel (due to Hyper-V redirected access).

Therefore I would like to reduce them down to a single job containing all replicated VMs so that I can be confident that the replications will all run one after another and there is no possibility of overlap.

My question is - If I was to simply delete the existing Replication jobs and create a new one targeting the same host/path/VMs/etc, would it automatically map to the existing replicas along with their CBT data? Or would I need to create a seeding job mapping to the existing replicas?

What I don't want to happen is to see duplication of data as the remote host would run out of disk space.
Vitaliy S.
VP, Product Management
Posts: 27377
Liked: 2802 times
Joined: Mar 30, 2009 9:13 am
Full Name: Vitaliy Safarov
Contact:

Re: Tidying up Replication Jobs

Post by Vitaliy S. »

Hi Mark,

There is no need to perform initial seeding, just map production VMs into existing replicas on the Hyper-V host to continue running incremental passes.

Thanks!
markharford
Influencer
Posts: 12
Liked: 3 times
Joined: Jun 02, 2011 3:33 pm
Full Name: Mark Harford
Contact:

Re: Tidying up Replication Jobs

Post by markharford »

Ok thanks.
So on the New Replication Job wizard, I would
1) tick the box for 'Low connection bandwidth (enable replica seeding)
2) In the seeding section, select 'Map replicas to existing VMs', click detect and map them
3) run the job

Any tidy up of the job required afterwards? I've noticed you have to do that for Initial seeding type jobs.
Vitaliy S.
VP, Product Management
Posts: 27377
Liked: 2802 times
Joined: Mar 30, 2009 9:13 am
Full Name: Vitaliy Safarov
Contact:

Re: Tidying up Replication Jobs

Post by Vitaliy S. »

Yes, the procedure looks good to me, no additional steps are required.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: arnaud.quenum, mkretzer, nvoloshin, PCM-AndyW, Semrush [Bot], Stabz and 129 guests