I have Veeam B&R 5.0.2 running in my environment with a 60TB local volume for Veeam backup files. These are pushed to tape via post job activity scripts and a locally installed IBM TSM client to a central TSM server.
My problem: Older .vib and .vbk files from days at the end of my retention are being modified during Veeam backups. This causes TSM to have to back them multiple times. This is wasting time, tape, etc. In my case, reclaiming Veeam disk space is less important than leaving old files alone so they don't have to be sent to tape over and over again.
The sticky FAQ post on this forum includes a link to a spreadsheet) which states that "Existing backups never touched" is true for incrementals, but this is apparently not the case in my environment.
Anyone have any idea what could be causing this? How can I prevent this behavior? It seems to be related to synthetic fulls, but I'm not sure if I'm missing something or if Veeam is always eager to reclaim space since it's entirely disk based.
My backup jobs are configured with these options:
Backup mode: Incremental with once-per-week synthetic fulls, no transform, no active fulls
Restore points on disk: 28
Deleted VMs retention period: 7 days
Deduplication: Enabled
Compression Level: Optimal
Storage Optimize for: LAN target
Here's a representative directory listing for one of my backup job directories. Notice how older files from mid-June were modified this morning.
Code: Select all
Name Modified GBs
---- -------- ---
JOB2011-05-27T220057.vbk 2011-07-06 05:11 758
JOB2011-06-16T044156.vbk 2011-07-20 04:56 762
JOB2011-06-16T180113.vib 2011-07-20 04:55 25
JOB2011-06-17T180102.vib 2011-07-20 04:55 16
JOB2011-06-18T180109.vib 2011-07-20 04:55 15
JOB2011-06-19T180058.vib 2011-07-20 04:55 23
JOB2011-06-20T180102.vib 2011-07-20 04:55 49
JOB2011-06-21T180114.vib 2011-07-20 04:55 21
JOB2011-06-23T052031.vbk 2011-06-23 07:33 804
JOB2011-06-23T180058.vib 2011-06-24 05:50 31
JOB2011-06-24T180112.vib 2011-06-25 05:02 24
JOB2011-06-25T180111.vib 2011-06-26 03:56 15
JOB2011-06-26T180107.vib 2011-06-27 04:38 25
JOB2011-06-27T180054.vib 2011-06-28 04:10 15
JOB2011-06-28T180112.vib 2011-06-29 05:11 43
JOB2011-06-30T054047.vbk 2011-06-30 08:05 831
JOB2011-06-30T180105.vib 2011-07-01 05:40 20
JOB2011-07-01T180059.vib 2011-07-02 05:11 21
JOB2011-07-02T180111.vib 2011-07-03 03:45 15
JOB2011-07-03T180117.vib 2011-07-04 03:51 26
JOB2011-07-04T180116.vib 2011-07-05 04:55 16
JOB2011-07-05T180115.vib 2011-07-06 05:11 21
JOB2011-07-07T051840.vbk 2011-07-07 07:36 834
JOB2011-07-07T180100.vib 2011-07-08 05:15 20
JOB2011-07-08T180100.vib 2011-07-09 04:57 21
JOB2011-07-09T180100.vib 2011-07-10 05:00 18
JOB2011-07-10T180105.vib 2011-07-11 03:50 24
JOB2011-07-11T180104.vib 2011-07-12 05:24 18
JOB2011-07-12T180117.vib 2011-07-13 05:58 19
JOB2011-07-14T043713.vbk 2011-07-14 07:00 818
JOB2011-07-14T180114.vib 2011-07-15 05:04 17
JOB2011-07-15T180107.vib 2011-07-16 05:01 14
JOB2011-07-16T180122.vib 2011-07-17 18:01 9
JOB2011-07-17T180102.vib 2011-07-18 04:11 29
JOB2011-07-18T180111.vib 2011-07-19 07:05 18
JOB2011-07-19T180101.vib 2011-07-20 04:55 17
James