VBR 9.5 - REFS

Availability for the Always-On Enterprise

Re: Windows 2016/ReFS magic, how do I know it's working?

Veeam Logoby DaveWatkins » Wed Dec 21, 2016 12:45 am

The easiest way is that you should see [fast clone] in the backup log in the GUI for each disk. You may also want to think about formatting with 64k allocation sizes in future.

You can also check if it's detected the ReFS volume by going into the backup infrastructure tab, selecting properties on the repository and going to the repository tab and hitting the advanced button. If it's detected the ReFS volume the top option (Align backup file data blocks) should be grayed out
DaveWatkins
Expert
 
Posts: 220
Liked: 57 times
Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2015 11:33 pm

Re: Windows 2016/ReFS magic, how do I know it's working?

Veeam Logoby Amarokada » Wed Dec 21, 2016 9:31 am

Hi Dave

As I suspected, it seems these repositories have not picked up on the fact ReFS is available. I'm not seeing [fast clone] anywhere and the align option is not greyed out.

So, what has to be done to get Veeam to recognise the change? I have avoided removing the repository entirely since I have many backups jobs that are configured to use it, and Veeam doesn't let you remove a repository until it is unselected from all jobs.

I have tried putting the repo into maintanence mode and back again, and also attempted to force refresh wherever I can within the repo properties, but it's still not picking up that the volume is ReFS formatted.

Do I literally have to delete and recreate the existing repository (and edit all my jobs across all servers) in order to force it to work?
Amarokada
Novice
 
Posts: 7
Liked: 1 time
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 4:24 pm
Full Name: Rob Perry

Re: Windows 2016/ReFS magic, how do I know it's working?

Veeam Logoby Amarokada » Wed Dec 21, 2016 10:10 am

Also, it seems if I am to delete the repository and re-add it, I also have to delete all the existing backup jobs from the database, otherwise it tells me to move all the backups to the alternative repository (which is just a dummy one for now, not able to hold all my backups).
Amarokada
Novice
 
Posts: 7
Liked: 1 time
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 4:24 pm
Full Name: Rob Perry

Re: Windows 2016/ReFS magic, how do I know it's working?

Veeam Logoby lorenzo » Wed Dec 21, 2016 3:27 pm

I suggest you to have a look to Anton Gostev video: "Ask Gostev #1 - ReFS integration FAQ"
lorenzo
Novice
 
Posts: 4
Liked: never
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2014 1:32 pm
Full Name: lorenzo

Re: Windows 2016/ReFS magic, how do I know it's working?

Veeam Logoby foggy » Wed Dec 21, 2016 3:56 pm

Amarokada wrote:I then formatted the local RAID disk with ReFS (4k allocation size), and then kicked off active-full backups of all my jobs.

Have you created a new repository for this new volume?
foggy
Veeam Software
 
Posts: 13888
Liked: 1011 times
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
Full Name: Alexander Fogelson

Re: Windows 2016/ReFS magic, how do I know it's working?

Veeam Logoby Amarokada » Wed Dec 21, 2016 4:35 pm

No I didn't, and am quickly realising that was the silver bullet step that I missed after formatting the drive. However I think I have found an easy way to migrate over to a new repository without having to edit all of my jobs or migrate huge amounts of data around.

1. Create a new repository with name "ReFS Scale-Out Repository Extent 1", and point it to a new folder on the ReFS volume of the same name.

2. Edit my scale out repository that consists of only the 1 previous backup repository extent, add the new ReFS one and remove the old one (without evacuation). Ensure that "perform full backup when required extent is offline" is ticked in advanced settings.

3. Kick off new active full backups of everything. I notice as these complete, the previous restore points on the old extent are removed from the database automatically (now shows only 1 restore point for each VM). All VMs warn that CBT data is out of date, but that is to be expected, and it is reset by Veeam.

Once I have a full weeks worth of backups I will delete the old extent folder.
Amarokada
Novice
 
Posts: 7
Liked: 1 time
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 4:24 pm
Full Name: Rob Perry

Re: VBR 9.5 - REFS

Veeam Logoby v.Eremin » Wed Dec 21, 2016 6:32 pm

Looks like a valid approach indeed. Kindly, let us know how well it goes. Thanks.
v.Eremin
Product Manager
 
Posts: 12357
Liked: 892 times
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2012 3:28 pm
Full Name: Vladimir Eremin

Re: VBR 9.5 - REFS

Veeam Logoby bryancc » Wed Dec 28, 2016 7:02 am

I am re-configuring my backup jobs with Veeam 9.5 and a remote repository running Windows Server 2016 / REFS. I'm having trouble finding the best path to take with the "transform previous backup chains" setting. In some environments will spaceless full backup technology provide enough space savings to where it might not be necessary to use the "transform previous backup chains" setting anymore? Thanks!
bryancc
Lurker
 
Posts: 2
Liked: 1 time
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2016 4:34 pm
Full Name: Bryan

Re: VBR 9.5 - REFS

Veeam Logoby foggy » Wed Dec 28, 2016 12:58 pm

Yes, since subsequent full backups will not occupy additional disk space, the total disk space taken by the entire backup chain will be comparable to the chain with transformation to rollbacks enabled.
foggy
Veeam Software
 
Posts: 13888
Liked: 1011 times
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
Full Name: Alexander Fogelson

Re: VBR 9.5 - REFS

Veeam Logoby wasc » Mon Jan 09, 2017 8:39 am

Is there a list anywhere of the backup jobs which benefit from the fast clone technology?

For example I assume a Daily forward incremental backup job which has the 'Create synthetic full backups periodically' checked would benefit from REFS, but what if the same job had 'Create active full backups periodically' instead of 'synthetic full'???

Would they both create a full backup that is spaceless and created quicker?

Am I correct in saying as well that reverse incremental jobs benefit from REFS but only to reduce IO and not to reduce disk space (since all the blocks fast clone is moving out of the VBK are being replaced with new blocks)?

It would be nice if there was a table of different types of jobs, and then ticks to say whether each job benefits from a speed boost, but also whether it benefits from spaceless?
wasc
Influencer
 
Posts: 17
Liked: never
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 4:22 pm
Full Name: Alex

Re: VBR 9.5 - REFS

Veeam Logoby v.Eremin » Mon Jan 09, 2017 11:26 am

Have you checked already the list of operations benefiting from fast clone technology? Thanks.
v.Eremin
Product Manager
 
Posts: 12357
Liked: 892 times
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2012 3:28 pm
Full Name: Vladimir Eremin

Re: VBR 9.5 - REFS

Veeam Logoby yasuda » Mon Jan 09, 2017 4:06 pm

tsightler wrote:It just feels like it's getting harder to justify having the extra ZFS layer in there.


Tom, ZFS provides bit rot correction; would that make Integrity Streams unnecessary and be a justification for ZFS? I don't know about performance, but ZFS has a longer track record, and maybe there's a benefit to abstracting that from the Windows OS.
yasuda
Enthusiast
 
Posts: 37
Liked: 8 times
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 3:29 pm
Full Name: Peter Yasuda

Re: VBR 9.5 - REFS

Veeam Logoby foggy » Mon Jan 09, 2017 4:37 pm

wasc wrote:For example I assume a Daily forward incremental backup job which has the 'Create synthetic full backups periodically' checked would benefit from REFS, but what if the same job had 'Create active full backups periodically' instead of 'synthetic full'???

Would they both create a full backup that is spaceless and created quicker?

No, Fast Clone is used during synthetic operations.

wasc wrote:Am I correct in saying as well that reverse incremental jobs benefit from REFS but only to reduce IO and not to reduce disk space (since all the blocks fast clone is moving out of the VBK are being replaced with new blocks)?

Reverse incremental is already the most efficient in terms of space usage, since the chain consists of a single full + increments. That said, new full backup file created during compact operation does not require extra space in case of reverse incremental as well.
foggy
Veeam Software
 
Posts: 13888
Liked: 1011 times
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
Full Name: Alexander Fogelson

Re: VBR 9.5 - REFS

Veeam Logoby btmaus » Tue Jan 17, 2017 9:33 am

What's the recommendation for moving existing Veeam restore points to a new ReFS repository?
btmaus
Expert
 
Posts: 120
Liked: 8 times
Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2015 9:02 am
Full Name: Glenn L

Re: VBR 9.5 - REFS

Veeam Logoby foggy » Tue Jan 17, 2017 12:32 pm

Glenn, have you reviewed the recommendation given in the thread above?
foggy
Veeam Software
 
Posts: 13888
Liked: 1011 times
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 10:22 am
Full Name: Alexander Fogelson

PreviousNext

Return to Veeam Backup & Replication



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], cfanta@theitco.net, ericlaiys78, Google [Bot], jmmarton, mpark and 49 guests